holowoodman

21 ms·

361.
by holowoodman 2y ago
I guess mass produced nukes would rather be enriched uranium based, due to the far easier construction. No fiddly implosive lens assembly. No weird multi-phase cristallization that goes critical if you blink. Metal that is merely as dangero
362.
by holowoodman 2y ago
Maybe he works for a proprietary-software company that wants to just take the code and never give back. Or maybe he is dissatisfied with lots of OSS licenses being mutually incompatible. But it is weird that just MIT seems to be acceptable
363.
by holowoodman 2y ago
No. Tax deduction effectively excludes middlemen if they don't exclusively distribute to tax-deductible purposes. And at least in Germany, the hurdle is high, as is the risk of being retroactively declared non-deductible, after which y
364.
by holowoodman 2y ago
And spending on other projects might create tax problems for them, their donors and maybe the other projects...
365.
by holowoodman 2y ago
well, maybe something about satoshi, the king arthur or mithras of bitcoin ;)
366.
by holowoodman 2y ago
misread it as "Does a cave beneath Pembroke Castle hold key to fate of early Bitcoins?"
367.
by holowoodman 2y ago
Isn't there a subway connection or something? I mean, it is an international airport and a big city...
368.
by holowoodman 2y ago
Excessively requiring tipping is a form of tax-dodging. Tips are untaxed and exempt from social security fees.
369.
by holowoodman 2y ago
Even randomness isn't unbiased. A random distribution will have local minima and maxima, just not in all the same places in the next try.