Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hoistbypetard
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
The airline asks the age of each minor traveler when tickets are booked. The airline could perfectly well require that a kid be seated next to a caretaker. (Regardless of whether they impose an extra charge for that.) Your gripe here is wit
92.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
The Behind the Bastards podcast episodes covering Frank Lorenzo might be right down your alley: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bmGff5f-Ug (They are available from all the usual podcast places, but it just happens that the
93.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
That makes sense. I just found it interesting that the markings were considered something that could fall into that category. I thought those were usually so broad (e.g. NOFORN) that they wouldn't be.
94.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
It's interesting that they chose to redact some of the markings on the document. (e.g. you see "SECRET" and below that there's a redacted mark.)
95.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
> Microsoft absolutely did not do that. They rammed through their proprietary bullshit and slapped an "open standards!" label on it. We are agreeing, I think. I was saying that the format was not developed as an act of sabotage
96.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
What I mean is that it is just the internal binary format they were using before, converted to XML. I don't believe the file format was developed as an act of sabotage; it was just some internal shit they were using because that's
97.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
The format wasn't the act of sabotage. The way they drove it through the standardization process was. It couldn't have been standardized through the normal process. Similarly, pointing to it, afterwards, as if it were just as impl
98.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
It's nice that they enumerate the risks: https://support.anthropic.com/en/articles/12012173-getting-s... It's much less nice that they're more-or-less silent on how to mitigate those risks.
99.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
I understand that annoyance. But that's why it can't "cross-compile perfectly fine."
100.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
Email sending services now offer tips on how to evade the filters that apply those special labels. And if you buy the expensive version, they'll even help you test whether or not your edits were effective at that. So maybe google fucke
101.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
Maybe? I've got an email address that's 25 years old, and there's so much spam that I rarely use it; if I don't see an email within about 1 hour of receiving it, it's off the first screen. I still go there periodica
102.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
And its development got really quiet for a few years, I think.
103.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
It's decidedly in my default load for my Linux desktops. And I don't dislike it on Mac, either. The only reason I ever came to try Base is because I use Setapp for a few other things and Base is included.
104.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
Because it a GUI that uses Mac-specific UI libraries that aren't available on Linux and Windows? While the database stuff works on Linux and Windows, building UIs for the 3 platforms is very different, unless you use some cross platfor
105.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
I can feel this block, especially when I'm starting a new project. Two things that help me: * have a good boilerplate * ship things that do nothing i.e. I find it helps to start a project using my good boilerplate then set up builds an
106.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
Doesn't the blog post specifically say they are shipping their own glyph rasterizer?
107.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
I had that feeling about several questions. The one that stood out to me was """ When debugging, I typically: * Write tests to isolate the problem * Reason about the code logically first * Add print statements to understand d
108.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
The protocol is not being specified. Requirements for such a protocol are being proposed. Though my assumption from reading these requirements would be that the user-agent would be performing an HTTP GET request. Whether proposing requireme
109.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
I clicked through hoping for an interesting Raymond Chen post. I was disappointed.
110.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
I tried on the mac store. For the unquoted search, it now comes in 7th for me. If I just search for ublock, I don't see it at all. The mac store has long been bad, but this seems worse.
111.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
It feels like a missed opportunity. You could have attempted some humorous prompt injection.
112.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
That makes sense, at least as a partial explanation. Thanks.
113.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
> It's simple. Getting a commercial pilot license is a much more involved process than getting a private pilot license. I understood that. But the post I quoted said that you couldn't accept payment even if you were a licensed
114.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
> Actually, even if you are a licensed commercial pilot, there are still strict rules around payment. You can be paid for your skill as a pilot, but you cannot, e.g. charge for giving rides in your personal airplane. While that sounds li
115.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
When I click the link, I just get a bunch of JSON... https://pasteboard.co/Rpp35synt4CW.png Am I missing a joke, or has something broken?
116.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
I appreciate that. I would add that she might be able to do everything I did (with my 8-bit micro when I was 10) with the pi I set her up with. The thing I was impressed with about the pi was how little I had to help her interface with sens
117.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
I think the term "supply chain attack" is frequently overused, and if I were feeling cantankerous, I might split hairs and argue that I was framing it more as a "watering hole attack" instead. But I agree that it could a
118.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
On the other hand, if you want to make your tool detect an agent and try a little prompt injection, or otherwise attempt to make the LLM misbehave, this seems like an excellent approach.
119.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
> No, give me a new "hobbyist" computer in the spirit of those days. Throw an ARM m-series/RISC-V/etc on it with some custom blitter/vdpu and sound ASICs and 512MB of RAM. Give it some easily accessible programmi
120.
▲
by
hoistbypetard
1y ago
> an "unauthorized" modification of your own computer and void the warranty to install it Citation needed. This modification doesn't look to me at all like it'd void the warranty unless you damage the machine while yo
More ›