hohenheim

8 ms·

61.
by hohenheim 11y ago
Your requirement is unrealistic. "safe AND simple" can not be if the problem is inherently complex. Security is complex. Sure there could be third party providers that take care of the complexity and provide a service for you, but
62.
by hohenheim 11y ago
To elaborate a bit, Copenhagen Interpretation of QM states that the cat is both alive and dead. It will only settle down on a form, dead or alive, once we observe it. You could read farther on the subject [1]. [1] https://en.wiki
63.
by hohenheim 11y ago
That is not a problem. That is competition. Imagine the opposite where a company has monopoly over the technology.
64.
by hohenheim 11y ago
This is subjective and dependent on the background. I, as a beginner, found the original expression easier to understand, whereas, the "->" macro rewrite seems puzzling. Specially (map #(+ % 2)) looks as if the values are summe
65.
by hohenheim 11y ago
I agree that user data is driving the "free" service of social media. But I don't see your point when you say an open social media implementation failed because it was open. You imply that Facebook succeeded since it was a cl
66.
by hohenheim 11y ago
Trusting closed-source applications over open-source sounds odd. Security by obscurity is not desirable. What you said about open-source, everyone can read it, is a strength not a weakness. As long as there is programming there are bugs. We
67.
by hohenheim 11y ago
Thanks. It turns out the coloured pictures are taken by Ralph [1]. One of the three cameras on New Horizon. [1] http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/07/the-ca...
68.
by hohenheim 11y ago
Any idea why the colour changes from grey to sepia between 12'th and 13'th July?
69.
by hohenheim 11y ago
And no Linux support. I wonder why. Is it because everyone is happy with CLI?