hobofan

44 ms·

871.
by hobofan 3y ago
> and a pile of utils to go with that library I think in terms of tech debt, that's a big part of it. I don't think I've ever seen a python package that was supposed to be used as a library with that many dependencies (tha
872.
by hobofan 3y ago
Just to spare anyone the time: When they say "reproducible" they mean "can be done again" and not "can be done again with a consistent result". No lockfiles, no checksums, URLs that may disappear and change at
873.
by hobofan 3y ago
Yes, as it's based on WASIX, the superset of WASI created by Wasmer, that is (and probably will be) the only runtime that will run WinterJS.
874.
by hobofan 3y ago
I don't think that's the intended use-case for this. If you want to do this, I think something like ComponentizeJS[0] is what you would be looking for. As far as I can tell you'd also need to create WIT (Wasm Interface Type)
875.
by hobofan 3y ago
LiteFS Cloud does nothing to help with the single-writer limitation of LiteFS.
876.
by hobofan 3y ago
Of course that's permitted. What they stated was only regarding claiming new ownership over crate names: > Using an automated tool to claim ownership of a large number of package names is not permitted.
877.
by hobofan 3y ago
> You would also want to add user and organization management easily to the product. That's usually something that I'd outsource as much as possible to Auth0 (yikes, considering the last days), as building out the UIs and state
878.
by hobofan 3y ago
I've been interested to see what Nile will be since the Twitter pre-announcement, and: uff. The tenant capabilities are nice to have, but even when building a tenant-focused SaaS not really a big draw. The examples shown even come down
879.
by hobofan 3y ago
So how would you expect to insight on whether the current code differs from the planned design documents? By always applying a lot of manual human labor?
880.
by hobofan 3y ago
If you have a fast API it's very feasible. I'll take slighly reduced UX due to slower page load times any day over unpredictable completely broken UX introduced by bad state management (common with e.g. Redux non-RTK in the hands
881.
by hobofan 3y ago
I think the key sentence is this: > But you don’t see them bandying it around like a kid with new light up shoes. Yes, because Google and other big players are not after VC money, while all the companies that put it in their marketing co
882.
by hobofan 3y ago
It's not a gift, it's a prize, which you are only likely to get if you spend a fulltime effort on it (thus losing out on other income sources). There also is a deadline until end of the year (not sure what happens after that). So
883.
by hobofan 3y ago
Yeah, though I have to admit that even though you get SSL certificates "out of the box" with a GKE + GCP load balancer setup, their provisioning has always been really slow for me (usually 1-2h, sometimes half a day). In compariso
884.
by hobofan 3y ago
Cloud Run is just Knative which is also Kubernetes, so in the end it comes out to about the same. I used to use Cloud Run, but in the end there were usually always some things that ended up making GKE the more convenient choice (e.g. access
885.
by hobofan 3y ago
If you find yourself on the Google cloud for some reason, GKE Autopilot is such a great hands-off solution that most alternative solutions will probably be more complex. I only recently had to use AWS EKS, and am pretty sure that many peopl
886.
by hobofan 3y ago
I think for there are two already okay options. As Syncthings UI is already in the browser, one would be to just host that page in a way that it's remotely accessible (e.g. in you VPN, where I can highly recommend Tailscale). The other
887.
by hobofan 3y ago
Already opened a bug report for that: https://github.com/spacedriveapp/spacedrive/issues/1481
888.
by hobofan 3y ago
> I understand Rust doesn't have any GUI frameworks (like Qt), but is this the way, then? Yes. If you want to build a cross-platform desktop app with Rust, Tauri + React would also be me recommendation right now. Tauri makes it quit
889.
by hobofan 3y ago
The cloud storage is the part I'm not interested in. I already use Syncthing, and it fills that need really well (tough with a UX so meh that I'd be hesitant to hand it to non-developers). I'm interested in e.g. tagging of fi
890.
by hobofan 3y ago
> so the UI portion will be just as slow as any Electron app Or as fast as any website built with a pinch of care to performance.
891.
by hobofan 3y ago
Since cloud storage solutions come preinstalled with the operating system. E.g. Finder + iCloud, Windows file manager + OneDrive.
892.
by hobofan 3y ago
It was kind of inevitable that after VC-funded terminals, mail clients, launchers sooner or later there would be file explorer. As someone on Linux (popOS), I also gladly welcome it, as even the best file explorer I know (nemo) could use ni
893.
by hobofan 3y ago
Since when is Syncthing a file explorer?
894.
by hobofan 3y ago
I own a Pixel 7 Pro (and owned the Pixel 6 Pro), and I regularly have iPhones of friends/family in my hands. Especially for the flagship Android phones like the Pixel Pros, I really don't think there is a noticable difference. The
895.
by hobofan 3y ago
I would generally try to characterize Shuttle as "the Vercel of Rust", though I guess that might not explain much to people that don't know what Vercel does.
896.
by hobofan 3y ago
Depends on the perspective. The predicate will always be an IRI. The object will either be an IRI or a literal, and all literals in RDF (as of RDF 1.1) are typed , though serialization formats like Turtle work with implied types. There is a
897.
by hobofan 3y ago
What makes you believe that Deno has a viable business model?
898.
by hobofan 3y ago
Honest question: Have you recently done any frontend development? I think your assessment might have been valid 3-4 years ago, but nowadays if you keep to an established framework (e.g. Next.js with Tailwind), frontend development is about
899.
by hobofan 3y ago
> People expect few bugs, good UI and UX. People/companies expect solutions for their problems. If the solution has bad UX and is still buggy but solves their problem "well enough", they'll usually pay for it. Also em
900.
by hobofan 3y ago
I think an alternative solution would be nice, where services are just registered with their service discovery, though I suppose that would require them providing an official API for that part of their product. In my current setup for Tails

More ›