ho_schi

10 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   Thanks. I don’t need that features but I see the use case for others.
2. 152.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   People say tmux is more powerful. Whatever that means? Screen seems to cover all my needs and it learning it is easy. I came for the tabs (windows), sessions, copy and paste - but the must have for everyone is the scrollback buffer. Y
3. 153.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   There are bugs. But Screen itself is running locally and per-user? I could imagine attacking from one tab (window) interacting with another tab but then the user runs already a harmful application. I worry more about everything contai
4. 154.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   Finally :) I’m waiting for a year that we don’t have to push Escape twice in Vim/Neovim. Some mouse emulation was catching it. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?57748 https://superuser.com/questions
5. 155.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   You can use mpv on the framebuffer-terminal. Pass the option —vo=drm and it works flawlessly with free drivers for AMD, Intel or Nvidia.
6. 156.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   If you’re into sport, I recommend Garmin. It shows notifications properly. Bonus, charge it once or twice in a week. It doesn’t try to be a smartwatch . No sport? I recommend a classy automatic wristwatch . Your movement winds it up. No
7. 157.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   GNOMEs Gtk has a companion library named libvte which provides the terminal as widget . It is used by Gnome-Terminal (and many other terminals) itself and now supports Gtk4: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/vte Basi
8. 158.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   Canonical is patching, more than Debian. Which is causing own specific bugs. Upstream developers don't like that. The attack through the xz package is just one last example. Fedora also patches but limit it to small changes e.g. tran
9. 159.▲
   by ho_schi 2y ago

   https://web.archive.org/web/20230315200925/http://antitrust.... What did changed since Microsoft used ACPI as tool against Linux? Enforced Auto-Updates, Ads, Cloud Account enforcement, Blocking Firefox p
10. 160.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    If it is in such immature condition it should be kept internal. If it doesn’t work at all in a web-browser which handles HTML5 and modern CS it is probably not a website - but a proprietary protocol which needs a special client-application.
11. 161.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    You cannot fix bugs if you don’t collect them. Neither Mozilla. If you have not enough resources, just collect and track. Fix them when more people are available. Same for native application ports, ship them as early as possible. Just mark
12. 162.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Blocks deliberately: * Epiphany with WebKit2-Renderengine. The literally block their own engine. * Firefox with Gecko. What year is it? 2001? No web developer should be allowed to “block” webbrowser. Test for features and sa
13. 163.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Thanks. Can you explain why rr is so much more efficient?
14. 164.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Thanks for the info and links :)
15. 165.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    GDBs built-in reverse debugging: https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ProcessRecord/Tutorial I assume rr provides more features and flexibility. Anyway I want to mention that GDB itself can already reverse
16. 166.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Yep. One of the things which the FSF did right was the GPL. They didn’t tried like programmers hack against bad things which never works in long term. The bad people will change the API, lock the bootloader, implement a problematic standa
17. 167.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    MSYS2 . And copy over prebuilt dependencies. And while we say C++ , I suggest always to use Meson as build tool. Which allows you to use WrapDB (built in dependency-manager) aside from available native libraries and own local sources.
18. 168.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Mostly Signal here :) SMS works fine and E-Mail is instant thanks to Push-Mail. Nearly no force on, others. Both standards. If they tell you the will cut the contact with you if they cannot force WhatsApp on you…that tells something about y
19. 169.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    I wonder why people suck things like Cloud, Co-Pilot or Adobe, WhatsApp or Windows? Let me guess. It seemed once convenient . This is the root of all evil. Don’t use it because it was pre-installed (Windows). Don’t keep using it because it
20. 170.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    The problem of the European Union is that it is founded not on the concepts of a federation or union states. And finally merging into one nation. The European Union is building up on the „ Montanunion (long version: European Coal and
21. 171.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    That’s not correct and the Steamdeck proofs it :) The manufacturers are always the key. What ships pre-installed and/or runs well after setup matters. Thats why ThinkPads run so well with Linux. ThinkPads are certified for Linux o
22. 172.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    I will not buy an device with ARM running Microsoft Windows. Ship it with Linux or we ignore it like the other devices with ARM. Windows isn’t built for ARM and the closed-source software isn’t running well or slowly on ARM. The reason
23. 173.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Native port for Linux :)
24. 174.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Yep. Theoretically it is possible but libasan is not intended for linking or shipping in production. Also stuff like LeakSanitizer[1] actually cannot [1] be used with GDB. While shipping debug symbols is something I recommend and has no s
25. 175.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    Regarding the addition to libxx: I’m not fond of adding an increasing number of specific compiler options which need to be turned on for memory-safety. It should be default whenever possible. What do you think? I love -faddress=sanitizer
26. 176.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    A wannabe replacement by…Herb Sutter. I dare to differ.
27. 177.▲
    by ho_schi 2y ago

    CPP2/cppfront: https://github.com/hsutter/cppfront I hope we see this in C++26 as optional mode i.e. #safe and #unsafe and same for #impdef or so.
28. 178.▲
    by ho_schi 3y ago

    Still :( Google Scholar 404. That's an error. Sorry, no content found for this URL That's all we know.
29. 179.▲
    by ho_schi 3y ago

    Thanks for your comment. Maybe I’m wrong in that part. Your link sadly doesn’t work and shows an 404. I’m a little confused because the Wikipedia says: AT&T itself recommended a divestiture structure in which it would be broken up
30. 180.▲
    by ho_schi 3y ago

    Apple isn’t considering that they are the baddies? I suggest strong regulation of the complete BigIT and two chairs for public observers at minimum. In addition they are not allowed to enter any new market. Why? Because it worked well w