hnpolicestate

18 ms·

271.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
A solution with unknown risks for a problem effectively solved by condoms.
272.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
I'm not a professional programmer or developer, so take my comment for what it is. There's no chance I will ever use Windows 11 for the privacy reasons discussed here ad nauseam. But I'm not super comfortable with Linux. I in
273.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
"secret authoritarian “plot” to preserve the ability to spread antidemocratic conspiracy theories" - Applebaum is an American citizen so she should already know this but it's not an "ability", it's a right we a
274.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
American as apple pie. I know my rights.
275.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
Extremely difficult to make a national security case for restricting speech or access to content. A court will also want to see a specific cause. Much of the Patriot Act is probably unconstitutional but the government had 9/11 as a nat
276.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
The bill is unconstitutional. See the recent Montana ruling. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-and-eff-applaud-rul...
277.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
This isn't accurate. The government has never banned Americans from watching a foreign television show or listening to a foreign radio broadcast. Please don't distort history.
278.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
I appreciate the feedback but I disagree. The law would prevent Google and Apple from hosting the TikTok APK on their app stores if the company refuses to divest, yes? I don't think it's legal for the government to tell Google or
279.
by hnpolicestate 2y ago
This is the 3rd time I'm trying to share a perspective that keeps getting flagged. Bytedance does not have to divest because it's against the law for the U.S government to prevent Americans from reading, viewing or saying what the