hnhg

23 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   I'm not replying to that.
2. 272.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   I suspect because it means acknowledging that there isn't particularly special about one's little in-group, and that talent also lies outside of how one identifies. For example, I've heard that good candidates are impossible
3. 273.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   Say there was a disease that predominantly affected a given race. Would you then object to a health system producing a tailored response to that group based on group characteristics? e.g. https://www.gaucherdisease.org/blog&
4. 274.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   I wouldn't be surprised if over the years employees have been making canny decisions on the stock markets. Facebook also has a lot of information via its portfolio of services to enable this too.
5. 275.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   That article doesn't say what you claim it does. It also covers a lot of stuff that would be no surprise to anyone in the EU (within and outside of Germany), and it's not particularly well put together either. Any article talking
6. 276.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   I don't know where you get your information from but it's largely fantasy. Perhaps you should spend some time in Germany getting to know it. Then you might also find the implication that Germans are lazy and getting foreigners to
7. 277.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   The BBC just posted an interview with him from 1972 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BBCArchive/videos/2691775331059950/
8. 278.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   I don't know if you're referencing it but that was the ending of Real Genius: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rthHSISkM7A [edit: possibly a spoiler?]
9. 279.▲
   by hnhg 6y ago

   Do they fully instrument their drivers vehicles? I'd imagine a lot of sensor data is needed for self-driving cars.
10. 280.▲
    by hnhg 6y ago

    I was just a lurker.
11. 281.▲
    by hnhg 6y ago

    fuckedcompany
12. 282.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    This forgets the high likelihood that the amount that would have been paid as severance goes to the pockets of the owners and leadership. The market pays what the employees are worth, not what is left over after costs.
13. 283.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    I also think it's responsible for the unisex fannypack comeback success.
14. 284.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    Pubmed is littered with similar authors in peer-reviewed journals. He's not the only one. This shows the problem right now. If you're not an expert, you don't know what you don't know, and have to yield to some kind of a
15. 285.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    I haven't dived deep into this topic, and this isn't a challenge to what you're saying, but what are your thoughts on the points here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/
16. 286.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    To argue devil's advocate, the scientific literature commenting on this says that existing studies are in too short a timeframe to draw long-term conclusions. I haven't dived into this other than a search on PubMed so it's a
17. 287.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    I've tended to side with the "5G must be safe" crew but to see the other side I checked pubmed and found a fair few reputable-looking studies such as this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31991167 So
18. 288.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    Very helpful, thanks.
19. 289.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    How does something like sonic-pi or tidal cycles compare with this? I wanted to try those out since they look fun and accessible. http://sonic-pi.net/ https://tidalcycles.org/
20. 290.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    Except you can't connect to 2 devices simultaneously with the XM3s meaning that many of us got the Bose instead ;)
21. 291.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    Yeah, I did. In that case, I agree.
22. 292.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    Please don't fall into ad hominem attacks. I don't think it helps the conversation here. I took a look at the study linked and I could see some problems in experiment design. There are so many confounding factors that aren't
23. 293.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    You seem to be ignoring this: 'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.' If it helps consider it from a Bayesian pov - just give us some decent evidence and it will start to shift our prior belief, which is so far base
24. 294.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    Don't forget its use in cigarette filters.
25. 295.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    The WHO agrees with the OP: 'Both COVID-19 and influenza cause respiratory disease and spread the same way, via small droplets of fluid from the nose and mouth of someone who is sick.' https://www.who.int/dg/s
26. 296.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    So now we're supposed to have a fear of touching things as well as all the other neuroses programmed into us in modern life? I need to invest in some mental health startups.
27. 297.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    I'll say it again, it's a piece of writing that wouldn't warrant any attention if it weren't for the author's status here. I'm halfway through and my brain is stunned by the effort of forcing it down. PG needs
28. 298.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    Technology is not the answer to this problem. If I had this issue, I think the underlying issue would be confidence and the ability to communicate.
29. 299.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    They say we need drastic changes based on the best evidence we have along with given the likely outcomes if change isn't introduced. What you're saying is that you have established a prior that undermines all further evidence pres
30. 300.▲
    by hnhg 7y ago

    There is one thing to gain: an easy lesson in how things can be subjective. I believe the world suffers because many people profoundly reject this.