hnaccy

39 ms·

361.
by hnaccy 9y ago
It's cliche in America to absolve drivers of any culpability when killing pedestrians and cyclists let alone a case involving a local government that was actively courting a known unethical company. Until they release footage I'll
362.
by hnaccy 9y ago
>speeding >didn't engage breaks Definitely gives me confidence in self-driving cars, at least she "may have been homeless" so I can sleep easy tonight. Thanks Uber and Tempe!
363.
by hnaccy 9y ago
I understand and personally am very cautious around driveways especially if they don't have perfectly clear sight lines. I just find it odd when cyclists out of principal decry riding on the sidewalk when the danger of riding with traf
364.
by hnaccy 9y ago
The cause of the accident was a careless driver (or algorithm) not checking before crossing a lane. I can do it, why can't they?
365.
by hnaccy 9y ago
>you're creating the same type of problem that cars that ignore traffic rules create for bikes Which are what? Such a broad statement doesn't seem accurate and the sidewalk shown in the map looks low traffic with excellent sigh
366.
by hnaccy 9y ago
Swapping in a new battery and replacing the CD drive with an SSD gave my laptop a new lease on life.
367.
by hnaccy 9y ago
The same reason stairs exist.
368.
by hnaccy 9y ago
This is more like the police paying plumbers if they find drugs in your house.
369.
by hnaccy 9y ago
What state(s) requires it of everyone?
370.
by hnaccy 9y ago
There's likely an affirmative defense, e.g., less than three images and you took reasonable measures to destroy them. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2252A
371.
by hnaccy 9y ago
Is that an automated process? The comment section didn't strike as being particularly uncivil. Seems odd that both that and the post about google's poorly implemented gun filter were removed from front page.
372.
by hnaccy 9y ago
I disagree with this but I do selfishly wish I could get a "diversity" boost when applying. Too bad being LGBT is effectively invisible to recruiters.
373.
by hnaccy 9y ago
>But the cool part is that you can also track when someone views your ad, and then a bit later types in your web address to make the purchase without ever clicking the link. >In other words you can track both people who click through
374.
by hnaccy 9y ago
So Idiocracy was right?
375.
by hnaccy 9y ago
>Weekends have _at most_ 6 hours of leisure per day. Why?
376.
by hnaccy 9y ago
If you machine translate assembler to Java won't you still end up with confusing code?
377.
by hnaccy 9y ago
It's not immoral to not tip.
378.
by hnaccy 9y ago
How does masturbating to a bondage video throw away a good portion of your future?
379.
by hnaccy 9y ago
>It is arrogant to believe that one can predict what will exactly happen because of just one piece of technology. I agree which is why I wouldn't count on immortality being shared with the unwashed masses just because a ride sharing
380.
by hnaccy 9y ago
I doubt there are many who are specialized they can only work on life extension research and not other areas of science or medicine. I think a more apt analogy would be asking a Rolls Royce mechanic to stop and come work on fixing the publi
381.
by hnaccy 9y ago
Improved dental care or malaria treatment would have few if any downsides. Immortality limited to the powerful few could have huge downsides, at least now we can count on them dying eventually. Maintenance of consolidated power through the
382.
by hnaccy 9y ago
Janet Damore?
383.
by hnaccy 9y ago
Having you head on a swivel for would-be child snatchers at all times seems like irrational paranoia. I imagine it's the deceptively mundane that is the true danger, automobiles being the most obvious.
384.
by hnaccy 9y ago
Could you describe some of these practices?
385.
by hnaccy 9y ago
By moral being I do not mean they act morally but that they deserve moral consideration. If this were not true why are we repulsed by the beating of an animal? Why do we invent such paradoxical concepts as the "humane" slaughterho
386.
by hnaccy 9y ago
I fail to see how the possibility of further debate in the finer details makes the answer to your original question, what animals are moral to consume, less obvious. Would you accept a plantation owner claiming slavery's immorality was
387.
by hnaccy 9y ago
Is justifying the wrongness of slavery unproductive? Was it just a subjective discussion with no right or wrong answer?
388.
by hnaccy 9y ago
>Which animal we morally can eat is a huge and difficult concept... I'd say it's rather simple, the issue is most people are unwilling to make the sacrifices required to live morally. Given their clear intelligence and ability
389.
by hnaccy 9y ago
So what's the takeaway given we have the opposite occurring now?
390.
by hnaccy 9y ago
It's a plastic replica of a turtle with an artificial rifle texture. The human's error is in missing the texture. The computer's error is worse, it misses the turtle and thinks the texture is an actual rifle.

More ›