hn_acker

37 ms·

721.
The Prince, the Paedo, the Palace, and the "Safety Tech" App(heatherburns.tech)
3 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
722.
Congress–Not The Pentagon or Anthropic–Should Set Military AI Rules(lawfaremedia.org)
4 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
723.
A Perforated Corporate Veil(pluralistic.net)
1 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
724.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
Government-mandated scanning requirements on people's printers for supposedly illegal guns would be similarly unconstitutional to government-mandated scanning requirements on people's phones for CSAM. I happened to remember readin
725.
The Billionaires' Eugenics Project(virginiaheffernan.substack.com)
5 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
726.
A First-Hand Look at the Messy Underbelly of DMCA 512(c) Takedowns(blog.ericgoldman.org)
2 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
727.
DOGE Bro's Grant Review Process Was Literally Just Asking ChatGPT 'Is This DEI?'(techdirt.com)
191 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|50 comments
728.
FDA No Longer Warns Against Ineffective Autism Treatments Like Chlorine Dioxide(propublica.org)
9 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|3 comments
729.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
The original title is: > Chlorine Dioxide, Raw Camel Milk: The FDA No Longer Warns Against These and Other Ineffective Autism Treatments
730.
What's a "gig work minimum wage"(pluralistic.net)
6 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|1 comments
731.
EFF to Wisconsin Legislature: VPN Bans Are Still a Terrible Idea(eff.org)
8 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
732.
Pre-Publication Moderation Can Disqualify Services from DMCA 512(c) Safe Harbor(blog.ericgoldman.org)
3 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|1 comments
733.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
The full title is: > Pre-Publication Content Moderation Can Disqualify Services from the DMCA 512(c) Safe Harbor–McGucken v. ShutterStock
734.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
> This is obvious gross insubordination Really? CBS's lawyers cited the equal time rule, which only applies to broadcasts sent over limited airwaves. I think the equal time rule doesn't actually apply in this case (because why
735.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
> The Biden admin were actually sued for their relationship with social media companies. The suit failed but the conclusion was still that the administration was involved in pushing social media companies to take specific actions. https
736.
Australia's social media ban risks isolating kids with disabilities(theguardian.com)
6 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|2 comments
737.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
The original title is: > 'I've lost my friends': advocacy groups warn Australia's social media ban risks isolating kids with disabilities
738.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
A key excerpt: > Administration officials speaking to media late last week hinted that something like that might eventually be possible, with one unnamed federal official telling reporters on a conference call that Moderna might have mor
739.
This Is What Destroying the Vaccine Market Looks Like(thebulwark.com)
9 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|4 comments
740.
White House uses USAID funds for budget director Vought's security(reuters.com)
7 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|2 comments
741.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
The full title is: > White House uses USAID funds for budget director Vought's security, documents show
742.
The Online Community Trilemma(pluralistic.net)
4 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
743.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
> We will have lots of smaller sites hosting content with their own individual editorial controls This can already happen right now. Nothing about Section 230 hinders or prevents people who would make the hypothetical "lots of small
744.
Fair Use Blocks Privacy-Motivated Copyright Lawsuit–MCM vs. Perry(blog.ericgoldman.org)
4 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|0 comments
745.
CCPA Assists a Private Right of Action–Shah vs. MyFitnessPal(blog.ericgoldman.org)
1 points by hn_acker 8mo ago|1 comments
746.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
The original title is: > California's Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Assists a Private Right of Action–Shah v. MyFitnessPal
747.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
> Didn't the police invite protesters in? They did not.
748.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
vel0city explains (among other things) the "natural monopoly" aspect of historical common carriers very well in other comments [1][2] on this page. Another major difference between historical common carriers and social media netwo
749.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
> YouTube just banned Guy Christensen from their platform. Now what? YouTube has both a First Amendment right and a Section 230 immunity to ban Guy Christensen (to the extent that a government actor/agency does not coerce YouTube in
750.
by hn_acker 8mo ago
> And do you know WHY you wouldn't get sued under section 230 when publishing content on a major corporate website? > Because lawsuits aren't free. Before Section 230, suing someone who posted defamation about you (which you

More ›