hluska

6 ms·

61.
by hluska 3mo ago
The article did not accuse you of anything and went so far as to say “There's nothing unlawful going on, and there's no reason to think RudderStack (or any company mentioned in this story) is doing something nefarious.” I’m strugg
62.
by hluska 3mo ago
So it works on desktop but it’s performative? I understand that it’s cool to be anti-police now but that’s some really strange reasoning.
63.
by hluska 3mo ago
Your tax bill says that you’re in bondage? That’s quite the tax system you have there. Or maybe you’re exaggerating?
64.
by hluska 3mo ago
Presumably a victim of a crime would provide the footage without a court order. A court order would be more applicable if it caught something unrelated to the actual property the camera was on.
65.
by hluska 3mo ago
It doesn’t work with a screen reader either and I tried two. It’s interesting to me that our hatred of AI is starting to look more like a dislike of the blind and visually impaired. The ADA suits will be absolutely hilarious and honestly, I
66.
by hluska 3mo ago
So it’s a myth but there’s a good reason to believe it happens?
67.
by hluska 3mo ago
The only thing you’re saying with “certainty” is that you personally cannot learn only from video. Anything else is pure hubris.
68.
by hluska 3mo ago
I can’t even estimate how many hours I sunk into some of these Maxis games. SimCity grabbed me harder than any game had ever grabbed me before and I’m sure I spent the equivalent of years of full time work playing it. SimEarth’s manual felt
69.
by hluska 4mo ago
That’s a lot of rage for something that does not impact you at all. Who cares? You don’t get to control everything around you online.
70.
by hluska 4mo ago
There is no real practical difference between ‘attested devices’ and scanning ID…
71.
by hluska 4mo ago
Not at all. Demonstrating that miles driven increases pedestrian deaths would be tremendously useful.
72.
by hluska 4mo ago
Wow has HN ever taken a turn. What would have once been a conversation about the vehicle has turned into non stop police hatred. Good job - you’ve all become parrots! It’s especially funny because the owner of the vehicle has zero problems
73.
by hluska 4mo ago
Thankfully, not everyone thinks like you do. I have zero problems with police and never have. I trust you’ve heard of different opinions?
74.
by hluska 4mo ago
Normalize being a nice person who doesn’t rip on people for no reason.
75.
Base Fatality List(bfl.baseaddict.com)
4 points by hluska 4mo ago|0 comments
76.
by hluska 4mo ago
I’m not sure I agree with this or maybe I don’t understand. In my experience, the over engineered code LLMs create have more big problems. Rewriting vast parts of code when I have an outage or need a new feature means the code evolves far f
77.
by hluska 4mo ago
No, we can’t clearly say that. If we could, they wouldn’t be taxable.
78.
by hluska 4mo ago
I don’t agree. You may agree with them but your agreement is not the same as substantive.
79.
by hluska 4mo ago
This is quite a lazy argument.
80.
by hluska 4mo ago
I don’t formalize anything that extreme for my teams because I can’t diagnose people, but I know that things like anxiety, imposter syndrome and a whole wack of things that aren’t related to work get involved. It’s acceptable to ask for hel
81.
by hluska 4mo ago
I don’t see any sign they own the original pressing which is $1300. Instead they own the 1977 remaster which apparently sounds as good as the original pressing though I don’t own the original. The 1977 remaster sells for between $5 and $50
82.
by hluska 4mo ago
You’re assuming that kids are capable of that. Neuroscience will disagree and I trust the brain research a lot more.
83.
by hluska 4mo ago
The question was simply how to avoid people falling through the cracks. That was it and while not worded all that well, it was a noble question. It didn’t need that level of sermon. Every reasonably educated person got your point after the
84.
by hluska 4mo ago
What are you talking about and how is that related to western media being primarily secular?
85.
by hluska 4mo ago
Good for you. Is there a point to that?
86.
by hluska 4mo ago
I totally missed that. Your original post was more of a rant but it sure sounded like you were blaming misogyny. It was a poor comment.
87.
by hluska 4mo ago
That is only a pension plan. It provides no insurance to teachers who are still employed.
88.
by hluska 4mo ago
A union could absolutely get involved in something like this.
89.
by hluska 4mo ago
You sound pleasant.
90.
by hluska 4mo ago
It’s still ugly as hell, the contrast ratios are godawful and it makes me question why I’d even do that to my eyes. Target or not, this is really hard to read.

More ›