hitarpetar

7 ms·

91.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
has this author heard of a mortgage before
92.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
oh it's anecdata? then I don't care. show me evidence please
93.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
thank you for confirming that you agree with the substance of my argument but have some weird ideological axe to grind with the conclusion! i also appreciate you wasting my time, failing to provide any other viewpoint or counterargument, an
94.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
it's so incorrect that you knew exactly what I was talking about and agreed with me before you accused me of spreading misinformation :)
95.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
sure, this whole discussion is ultimately subjective. maybe the Chinese room itself is actually sentient. my question is, why are we arguing about it? who benefits from the idea that these systems are conscious?
96.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
> you have never seen the night sky this is nonsensical. sometimes the devil is not worth arguing for
97.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
God forbids I engage in bad faith arguments with trolls who put words in my mouth
98.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
[flagged]
99.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
[flagged]
100.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
what about snowflake, that's a good one too!
101.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
is the doorbell camera industry held up by wife guys?
102.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
were you frightened also?
103.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
just to make this explicit, protecting civilians has never been the purpose of modern police forces. they were developed to put down rebellions/catch slaves/protect rich people's property
104.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
> There is also no substantial evidence that the sun will rise tomorrow the boosters are getting desperate
105.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
these are all true and great things to keep in mind, but I'm still struggling to work out how this relates to drug criminalization policy
106.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
running and slots are both addictive, so they must be equally bad for you right?
107.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
I would wager that using a fully fledged IDE has limited to no correlation with developer productivity across the entire industry
108.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
you meant to write unequal treatment for the wealthy right?
109.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
> Many developers are currently employees who objectively produce code of equal or lower quality than AI as it currently is. what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence
110.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
I wonder if you can use your empathetic powers to imagine that layoffs might negatively affect some well paid engineers who are NOT fiscally irresponsible victims of lifestyle inflation
111.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
pretty selfish to prioritize your housing situation over unlocking the AGI golden age
112.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
it seems like one of the most important parts of being an AI booster is getting to feel better than everyone else
113.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
> Tomorrows models may well do that though. yeah, and they also may not. I give it about a 50/50 chance, it either happens or it doesn't
114.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
AFAIK it's mostly AI startups doing 996, and it's driven by AGI mania/longtermist cult beliefs, not productivity per se
115.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
in general it's safe to assume your conversation partner has not read every single essay you have and come away with the same exact thoughts
116.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
it's interesting watching people work so hard to not feel empathy
117.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
and as we all know, economic growth is the only good thing in life
118.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
that's right, all your coworkers are incompetent but YOU have the secret
119.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
this is an argument against LLM cognition. we don't know anything about the human brain, and we don't know anything about LLMs, so they must be similar? I don't follow
120.
by hitarpetar 1y ago
that doesn't seem to be stopping anyone else from trying. what's different about your idea?

More ›