hinata08

31 ms·

301.
by hinata08 4y ago
Why don't you encrypt your password twice, give the resulting file or string to both of them, replicated twice or more ? And each one of them has the password for one of the two encryption layers ? This way it won't get lost.
302.
by hinata08 4y ago
I think the same Why would anyone access my Discord account, or my kawaii and punk music playlists on Deezer. This quality content goes with me into the grave. OK content is unencrypted on my computer, anyway
303.
by hinata08 4y ago
yup, 21st century practices for 21st century business needs but they don't make the code less buggy per se. They just allow to patch it faster.
304.
by hinata08 4y ago
I don't understand how this practice makes your modern code more reliable, sorry I was replying to >Are modern codebases with modern practices less buggy than the ones from 20 years ago? I understood that @NayamAmarshe acknowledged
305.
by hinata08 4y ago
Quality assurance and software engineering can be applied everywhere, no matter the processes you use to create and deliver the code. Methods and tools would be different, depending on context, but ANY serious company ought to do quality ma
306.
by hinata08 4y ago
In 1988, Airbus delivered the first A320 with electronic flight commands, which was safe. In 1998, the RATP inaugurated line 14 of the metro in Paris, which was fully automated, after formally proving that its software would never ever be a
307.
by hinata08 4y ago
oh these books there are still pretty much all around 'old' IT companies, displayed in shelves and bookcases, as artifacts that explains what were old languages and systems. I love the retro futuristic vibe of the cover of some of