Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
highfrequency
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
Quantifying dynamics of failure across science, startups and security
(arxiv.org)
1 points
by
highfrequency
2mo ago
|
0 comments
32.
▲
by
highfrequency
2mo ago
Curious what OP thinks about moving early stage trials overseas to Australia/China where regulatory pathways are less bureaucratic.
33.
▲
by
highfrequency
2mo ago
Indeed - if access to data or the permission to act on that data is limited by human gatekeepers (individual or bureaucratic), intelligence is often not the primary bottleneck. OP points out that this is usually the case in biology/med
34.
▲
Toil and Trouble: Don't Get Burned Shorting Bubbles
(papers.ssrn.com)
1 points
by
highfrequency
2mo ago
|
0 comments
35.
▲
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
Weighting by population seems reasonable here!
36.
▲
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
Copy paste out of tmux drives me nuts. Seems to work half the time. Interested in a good fix
37.
▲
Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding
(pnas.org)
4 points
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
|
0 comments
38.
▲
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
This is very insightful. I would be interested in reading an elaboration of your thoughts on this, particularly the role of BigCos and startups and the core nature of the problem in striking out on your own.
39.
▲
Up and Down the Ladder of Abstraction
(worrydream.com)
4 points
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
|
0 comments
40.
▲
Transcending Temptation Through Abstraction
(journals.sagepub.com)
1 points
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
|
0 comments
41.
▲
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
Hyperscaler free cash flow chart is interesting, but why does it omit Apple?
42.
▲
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
Seems natural enough. There will always be complexity and nuance that is missed by an AI model or person - the world is just super detailed. The more expertise you have the more you will be aware of that nuance. That doesn't mean the m
43.
▲
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
Did they at least rule out an easy prompt fix? "Stick to the spirit of the problem and don't cheat (eg reverse engineering the test cases or source code)"
44.
▲
by
highfrequency
3mo ago
Why UK?
45.
▲
What I learned competing against a convnet (Karpathy 2014)
(karpathy.github.io)
3 points
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
|
0 comments
46.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
> idea thief. Takes credit for others’ work. Based on what?
47.
▲
The Evolution of Unix
(nokia.com)
3 points
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
|
0 comments
48.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
Thanks, I appreciate the discussion. The paper you sent is interesting. I agree it looks like for moderate values of K (on the order of 100-1000), RL models actually look a little worse at pass@k than their base models. So perhaps the right
49.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
I wish it were ok for companies to bluntly say: “we made these decisions for competitive reasons, but the public backlash outweighed that so we are reversing course.” I think it’s normal and morally fine for companies to want to protect the
50.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
Sure, but I'd say that moving desirable trajectories from very low probability to high probability is characteristic of genuine human learning and discovery. Technically, quantum gravity, a bestselling novel, or a yet undiscovered pro
51.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
The model’s distribution will certainly change from the base model’s output distribution during reinforcement learning, shifting toward outputs that score well on an external evaluation. This is very different from mode-seeking. Am I missin
52.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
> RLVR still does not expand beyond the base distribution though, it only mode-seeks within it. Seems clearly false. Pretraining finds the mean/mode of the data distribution. RL can easily generate many samples around that mode, eva
53.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
Unless I'm missing something, this argument seems to apply only to the original pretraining era (eg GPT 1-4). The post-training and reinforcement learning paradigms are clearly doing variation, evaluation and selective retention no?
54.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
In particular, good to marinate beyond the (typically 6 month) lockup period during which investors cannot sell stock
55.
▲
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
Makes a lot of sense that Musk should do the parts of the AI stack that look more like manufacturing/regulatory bottlenecks, and rent out the compute to research-focused AI labs. Does anyone know the full accounting of how much it cos
56.
▲
New gene delivery vehicle shows promise for human brain gene therapy
(broadinstitute.org)
6 points
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
|
0 comments
57.
▲
Enlicitide lowers LDL by 60% with little side effect
(apnews.com)
16 points
by
highfrequency
4mo ago
|
0 comments
58.
▲
Ambrose to Theodosius I 390
(sourcebooks.web.fordham.edu)
2 points
by
highfrequency
5mo ago
|
0 comments
59.
▲
by
highfrequency
5mo ago
> now they’ve thrown down the gauntlet directly challenging frontier labs by training their own model (“much larger” than Kimi 2.5’s 1T parameters) from scratch. To clarify, the model Composer 2.5 announced in this post is not that; it
60.
▲
Keats, Letters
(sites.ualberta.ca)
2 points
by
highfrequency
5mo ago
|
0 comments
More ›