Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hh3k0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
391.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> You are of course entirely wrong. you are generalising when in reality your statement is true only for some employees in some jobs. I am not wrong: "According to Nielsen data, the American Payroll Association, CareerBuilder and th
392.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Nice anecdata. Unions are necessary to ensure fair negotiations between employees and their employer, though. Any negotiation between a single employee and their employer is inherently unfair, as the latter holds far more power. Unions are
393.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Clever way to entrepreneur yourself into bankruptcy, with a second COVID-19 wave likely following the first.
394.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Basically, it is the theory China used in order to justify the switch to State Capitalism. Here's more on the theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism_with_Chinese_charact...
395.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Your statement is wrong in two ways. 1) Communism and Islam can by no means be considered "friends", reason being the antireligious policies that are inherent in Communism. You should read less Breitbart. 2) China can hardly be co
396.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> We do have the technology. It's called nuclear energy. No, we do not. Nuclear energy is by no means emission-free. > There is no such thing as a zero- or close-to-zero emission nuclear power plant. Even existing plants emit due
397.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> [...] and for most intents and purposes is clean. It is not: https://www.sortirdunucleaire.org/Nuclear-power-a-false-solu...
398.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
It'd be nice if a no carbon future would be within reach but as far as I know, we do not have the technology to make this happen. Acting as if it's just a matter of time until we do... well, that is nothing short of a high-stakes
399.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
That makes me wonder, could they use a confession by someone they pumped full of ketamine an hour prior?
400.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> everyone has been single at some point Yeah but has everyone been single _all of the time_? Your reasoning reminds me of the "suck it up, we all have been bummed out before" mentality toward depressed people. > most people
401.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> Addictive poison, really? Wait til they see what's in fruit. Is that supposed to be a contradiction? It is in fruit and therefore it can't be bad? The poisonous fruit of Atropa belladonna comes to mind. > Of course in exce
402.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
It happens ever so often but not always -- maybe they're still phasing it in?
403.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
It's quite irritating if you browse 18+ subreddits and they stop you from seeing content, stating you need the app to see 18+ content. It's easily circumvented by replacing "www" with "old" in the URL, however,
404.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Thank you for your reply. I have to work but will make sure to read the link you provided on my tablet before hitting the hay tonight.
405.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> Yet we do not take drastic measures to prevent these deaths. We do, actually. A virus like COVID-19 and second-hand smoke are only comparable to a certain degree, though. For example, smoking in public indoor spaces is banned in many,
406.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> But they mean it in the sense that they should be in an asylum or should not be catered to. I have often heard it in a sense of "should not be catered to but rather given medical help". A fellow student once told me that he c
407.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> In places where people refuse to wear masks and social distance... Let them die at slightly elevated rates It's not necessarily them who die, though. A COVID-19 carrier who refuses to wear a mask and comply with social distancing
408.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> Therefore it's not possible to be racist towards you. I do wonder occasionally, when did institutional racism become the only flavor of racism?
409.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Please elaborate, as I fail to see how freedom of movement and residence would be unfair to them?
410.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> I wish we had a points based system here, they seem like a useful addition of fairness to the fundamentally unfair global migration situation. Let's not kid ourselves: fairness* would be if migration would _not_ be restricted. A p
411.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> The reason was that the allied side considered itself on the offensive, and saw no reason to makes the trenches more livable since they expected to leave them as soon as possible to advance in newly reconquered territory. There is a ce
412.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Aseprite came to mind for me, too. Then again, Aseprite is aimed at artists rather than programmers. I'd argue that most people who use it don't want to go through the hassle of compiling it themselves – compiling software can be
413.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> One of the chefs needed 10 years of experience before they would let him do the egg sushi. That only ever struck me as extremely pretentious, to be perfectly honest. The chef in question needing 10 years of experience before they would
414.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> The condescending tone was completely unnecessary given that you failed to even comprehend my point. Apologies, I didn't mean to sound condescending. > Your leg to stand on is that TikTok's (China's?) "shit"
415.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Please educate yourself on the matter: https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/fxgi06/not_new_news...
416.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> Insects are dead because we manufacturer billions of liters of insect-killing liquid to spray fields to feed billions of humans. That surely plays a role, too. Light pollution of street lights in Germany, however, kills an estimated 1
417.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Wow, indeed. What a quote. I can't believe a doctor wrote this.
418.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/fxgi06/not_new_news...
419.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
Thanks!
420.
▲
by
hh3k0
6y ago
> The introduction in the article is historically accurate, It is not. > compared to the countries behind the so called “iron curtain” that land was indeed different. Different, yes. Anti-authorian? A dictatorship? No.
More ›