herczegzsolt

6 ms·

61.
by herczegzsolt 4y ago
We're a tiny company, but it is basically "banned" for similar reasons. We're concerned more and more about GitHubs behavior ever since the Microsoft acqusition. Due to this, we've agreed not to use any proprietary
62.
by herczegzsolt 4y ago
I'd argue that anti-cheat is analogus to security-by-obscurity. It is basically a bad compromise to mitigate issues of a broken architecture. Imagine that online banks would do login checks on client side, and you'd have to instal
63.
by herczegzsolt 4y ago
This question sounds like you want to use Go and looking for justification :-). To answer your question properly: I think programming language should be a financial choice for any company, and one of the highest cost factors is developer ho
64.
by herczegzsolt 4y ago
I'd say yes. Anti-cheat and anti-crack has created far too many issues for me as a legitimate customer. I prefer paying for DRM-less content and opensource software, and i'd choose to pay them over commercially protected alternati
65.
by herczegzsolt 4y ago
Not entirely. It is a lot quicker to develop APIs in Go than to develop webpages. It is a very convenient choice and it's excellent compatibility promise makes it stable in long-term. It'll still be slower to develop and iterate i
66.
by herczegzsolt 4y ago
I'm just shutting down my startup, that was heavily relying on Gorilla-based web backends, but i've used django for larger projects as well. In my personal experience, python is great for prototyping, but you'll be in growth