hepta

7 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   IMO the original title is linkbait, even if not intended as such. Once you define "satisfaction" it makes more sense.
2. 32.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   I don't understand this, what is more "pythonic" about 2?
3. 33.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   I'd put XML and annotations in the same class of problem because they are (mostly) not checked by the type system. For instance, you can have a REST controller that simply does not "work" because you're missing an annota
4. 34.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   How much walking works for you?
5. 35.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   What are they?
6. 36.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   Curiously, the biggest benefits (of typed functional languages) for me are revealed with larger codebases or spiked code that I have to revisit some weeks later.
7. 37.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   Stream fusion (in Haskell) is the removal of intermediate lists created when you chain multiple list functions (map, filter, fold, etc). https://donsbot.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/haskell-as-fast-as-...
8. 38.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   Both Clojure and Scala work on the JVM, both have lazy sequences, Scala even has lazy evaluation. It's not the same as fusion, but it's not unnecessary iteration either. These are not invalidated by being on the JVM, Java can do s
9. 39.▲
   by hepta 11y ago

   This is great, thanks. I've also used something like this: https://gist.github.com/dwijnand/3741951