hellllllllooo

11 ms·

61.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Tried to use Apple's email client on a friend's phone to send and email to myself and 1 other person. I entered both emails with a space between them and it didn't handle it considering it a single email address. Tried to go
62.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
OPs HN title: > Autonomous Driving Inside the Heart HN title is different from the article and frankly terrifying given the state of autonomous driving
63.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Any idea what the approximate pricing per GB is and how it scales with more devices?
64.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Written by Nick Cleg, who now works for Facebook - the Lib Dem party leader in the UK who destroyed the party for ten years by making a deal with the conservative government to enable them to implement an unpopular adgenda while acheiving n
65.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Sure. But how do these rules prevent speculation?
66.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
I agree. I just don't understand how the rules described in the article actually incentive it. I get that they're small step towards it but they don't seem enough.
67.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Exactly. To make it a long term stock market there needs to be some incentives that make it so and imo the ones stated don't seem enough to deter short term thinking. Maybe there are some other rules that aren't listed in the arti
68.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
I don't really see how the rules mentioned will change things that much. > asking companies to limit executive bonuses that award short-term accomplishments. Why would I care as an investor? I still want the stock to go up quickly.
69.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Would be very interested to see the economics if drivers could set their own pricing.
70.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Fair enough, if you think mere symbolism is more important than putting the money ($42M) towards tangable things like childhood education which has an actual 70 year impact. Having so much time and money to spend on symbolism is pretty obno
71.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Obviously not. They're striking.
72.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
> but this is a gig / 'work only when you want This is not 'a work only when you want' job. People do it full time to feed their families and after doing it for years find it difficult to move to a different role for
73.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Is the plan for the original investors to sell their stock to regular investors before the whole thing tanks? They make their money and whoever followed is left holding the cheque. Seems like a Ponzi scheme as it's been clear for years
74.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Supply and demand issues can be addressed at both ends. The US is a large place and only a few cities have these issues. What's wrong with the jobs being elsewhere in the US in cities with more capacity if people are moving to the jobs
75.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
People move to SF to work. If companies decide to start elsewhere it spreads out demand for housing.
76.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
It might effectivly reduce demand.
77.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
No one is objecting to 20-100 year thinking and even then planning is hard if you look back 100 years and see what has changed. I would be very happy if these people were putting their time and money into solving problems on this scale like
78.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Am I the only one who finds The Long Now obnoxious? Mostly rich people who spend their money and time thinking about 10000 years from now as some kind of grandiose, pretentious, self-important hobby. Spending millions burying a clock isn&#
79.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
> this is just a distraction from the real shit Facebook is not all of the problem but it's definitely part of it. Facebook has clear privacy issues an implications and everyone uses it and knows about it. If highlighting its issues
80.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
The issue with doing things at huge scale are all the edge cases. If Facebook wants to have all the benefits and money it gets from owning its huge network it also has the responsibility of having to treat different content with nuance. The
81.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Does anyone who writes code for a living here actually spend 90% of their time reading code?
82.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
> suppression of opposing viewpoints How are they supresssing oposing viewpoints when alternative news sources are consistantly producing stories with a wide range of points of view? What is it exactly that they are supresssing? Through
83.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
They are a tool to be used where suitable and not the answer to everything. They are significantly better for detection and classification than what came before but improvement has plateaued. When they fail, how and why is not characterizab
84.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Maybe. I think if someone visits just to troll having to donate to a publication they dislike might be a reasonable deterrent and it improves user tracking for moderation. It could serve to focus the conversation to people who at least resp
85.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
I would be happy if comments on contentious articles were only open to donating members so they have some skin in the game and are contributing to the cost of moderation. Problem is they become full of drive-by trolls if left fully open.
86.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Encryption, medicine, transportation, food production etc.
87.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
You're agreeing with my point.
88.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
If you're equating modern economic policy with hard science you're making a pretty big stretch.
89.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Show me a news paper without a political bent? Centerism or balance for the sake of balance is also a political bent. The Guardian does a better job than most in reporting hard facts and news about the world. I wonder if you apply your stan
90.
by hellllllllooo 7y ago
Not really. Neural nets are good at detection and classification problems for objects in the environment but they are not a panacea. Assuming a neural net is good enough to detect everything a car will see (for pedestrians this isn't t

More ›