heimatau

30 ms·

211.
by heimatau 7y ago
> is at its infancy at best. Hence why the main source is published with ~90 subjects studied. Science starts with one paper/experiment and builds from there. > The lie is not that A and B are present at the same time. The lie is
212.
by heimatau 7y ago
That study is only reference to the existing consensus, not the actual study from the OP. I don't have the time to dig out the actual study but it looks like [1] it's originating in Canada (not NIH/USA) based on the publicati
213.
by heimatau 7y ago
I'm sure the 'crime' will be put under a different part of the law. I.e. Attacking a public official's property. They have different laws for them. Wouldn't change a thing.
214.
by heimatau 7y ago
I keep trying to use Brave but I feel that it drops the ball. I think Hamcha encapsulates most of my grievances. I'd like to add that if your Browser is trying to add a new dynamic of economics but your UX is terrible dealing with tips
215.
by heimatau 7y ago
In a PoW network (read Bitcoin), those that have the currency (satoshis/'sats') don't gain any more sats by just possessing them. The only way to gain more is from either those that have some or to mine more (until 2140)
216.
by heimatau 7y ago
The idea that bitcoin is 'wasteful' is entirely missing the solution that bitcoin is. Byzantine Generals Problem. This network is unmatched in it's provability and security. There is a turing complete machine, operating that
217.
by heimatau 7y ago
What I strongly believe is being overlooked here is not the fact that their 'liability math' has changed but the fact that this is the result of regional utility monopolies. The entire energy sector are allowed to operate in the
218.
by heimatau 7y ago
I do think this is closer to the truth even though you're being downvoted. I worked in the industry for about a year and I'm working on starting up my own company now. If you removed the 30% tax credit, it would turn $3 a watt int
219.
by heimatau 7y ago
Conk has a good response but you also have to realize that it's still too expensive to setup a battery as well. So, since the grid will be needed, you'll need conversion to be able to handle the fluctuating demand your home requir
220.
by heimatau 7y ago
I agree with your thought process but you also have to realize that overtime issues can arise. It would be difficult to say 'look at how safe they are' when in months or years later issues can come at their doorstep. I think analy
221.
by heimatau 7y ago
> Tesla/SolarCity must be using very cheap electronics because this shouldn't happen. Each panel's optimizer should be equipped for the situation when they aren't producing usable power. It feels nice to see the truth
222.
by heimatau 7y ago
This type of system should be able to be challenged by the citizen. If I voted without my prior knowledge, then I want my record because I never voted. This is pretty scary and I didn't know this occurred in other states.
223.
by heimatau 7y ago
With your Russian example there is a paper trail. There is a timestamp when that occured and if the machines that receive the ballots timestamp the receipt of the ballot and the location with scanner #, it's pretty easy to pinpoint the
224.
by heimatau 7y ago
> The circuit relies 100% on the microcontroller outputting the right signals I'm not an E.E. but does that apply for DC optimizers? Older optimizers had no AC conversions in them. > Little boxes like that are hard to waterproof
225.
by heimatau 7y ago
Hmm. I didn't know this but that's a solid observation. Regardless, SolarCity probably did a poor installation job with cheap parts. They have a reputation among other Solar installers and it's not a good one.
226.
by heimatau 7y ago
Very interesting theory when it comes to the change in air circulation. But I can't imagine a situation where that would occur unless Walmart's claims are valid on 'poor installation'. The brackets, that hold up the rail
227.
by heimatau 7y ago
sarcher's example of JLC. It does look like a faulty optimizer, which is a DC electronic for each panel. As for Walmart, it's a lot to unpack. > dozens showing hazardous problems such as loose wiring and “hot spots” on panels,
228.
by heimatau 7y ago
Wow. If they would've did their job they've prevent six months of theft. That's sad.
229.
by heimatau 7y ago
I've seen Amazon's sponsored tweets on Twitter. Didn't realize they are going so hard to work on their public image.
230.
by heimatau 7y ago
Hmm. Solid hypothesis. Any evidence?
231.
by heimatau 7y ago
>> No they didn't steal it. They don't even have access of Google! I didn't say they searched for it. Stealing isn't a Google search.
232.
by heimatau 7y ago
Honest question, did they steal this technology? Or have they innovated a new way to created a reusable rocket?
233.
by heimatau 7y ago
This would help with all the PTSD that cops face. The job is hard. This would humanize the trouble by reducing the stress in their work environment. Please keep advocating this idea, since it's novel but probably very effective to help
234.
by heimatau 7y ago
> they were engaged in shady SEO tactics then bitches that Google delisted them. As someone who did SEO for many years, Google was very serious about eliminating the 'black hat' SEO tactics. They were cheap, they were plentiful
235.
by heimatau 7y ago
The main issue with utility solar is regulations. Sure it's cheaper on a per watt installation basis but they'd be connecting to the grid with fluctuating generation which causes more expenses with needing to ramp up/down bas
236.
by heimatau 7y ago
If the issue is brought up to management more than 3 times then yes, it's gross mismanagement and could be solved. Which is why I provide France as a counter-example. They aren't mismanaging the potential issues. It's a solva
237.
by heimatau 7y ago
> It's not expensive to build or operate as long as everything goes right. If and when things go wrong it may be so expensive that dealing with it requires major resources. Say that to France. Stop buying the propaganda. HBO serie
238.
by heimatau 7y ago
It is cheaper by all measures. Which is what you're not understanding. Even if there is a a few years until actually being fully operational. It is still a better use of capital, providing the situation you described (no regulations fo
239.
by heimatau 7y ago
> Nuclear is expensive to build out, it needs investment. It's not expensive, financially, compared to Solar and Wind. But it is expensive politically. For whatever reason, Nuclear is toxic in the public's eye. To shift pub
240.
by heimatau 7y ago
It's 100% sustainable not 100% green. It should be the solution humanity picks, if we want to be serious about emission reduction but I wouldn't put my money on it.

More ›