heathrow83829

6 ms·

31.
by heathrow83829 6mo ago
>> the next era looks bright. but what could they possibly build that hasn't been done on iphone and ipad yet? these devices seem finished to me. all the latest features on these devices are getting increasingly useless, to be
32.
by heathrow83829 6mo ago
meat uses up enormous quantities of water. potatoes for instance use about 75 gallons to produce 2000 calories compared to say 1500 to 2500 gallons for 2000 calories of beef.
33.
by heathrow83829 6mo ago
they should go into more detail on what data specifically is suspectible to HNDL attacks as well as other attacks. they were pretty vague on that
34.
by heathrow83829 6mo ago
Yup. I've also seen a number like that mentioned by the Moonshots podcast by peter diamantis.. they showed that quarter by quarter the placement rate for CS grads had declined every querter for the last 3 years from 93% at 91K per ye
35.
by heathrow83829 7mo ago
the article doesn't explain how the math works. if min wage is 15$ an hour or 10$, how do they arrive at 1$ for 63 min???
36.
by heathrow83829 7mo ago
you gotta have some of all the above actually.
37.
by heathrow83829 7mo ago
You are lucky that you have the luxury of being able to work at a normal pace and not be pressured to go "even faster". My boss, is constantly saying "go faster, go faster". AI, is unfortunately the only way to keep up
38.
by heathrow83829 7mo ago
to till or not to till, that's the question. one way to look at is check the yields that result from dig vs no dig. Charles dowding did exactly that. for seven years he had two plots, one where he dug and one where he didn't.
39.
by heathrow83829 7mo ago
Sure they could develop it in a weekend, so could anyone else. but once a product has the initial userbase, that's not something a competitor can just copy. user acquision is the limiting factor to success, not writing code.
40.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
that's not the job of a company. companies are suposed to be profit centered, their purpose is to make money. what you're talking about is the role of government. govt should be supporting policies like you are suggesting, by fo
41.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
The biggest limiting factor is user acquisition. Just because you can build a competitor in a weekend doesn't mean you can easily acquire a user base. it's dam hard to get users even if your product is twice as good and your giv
42.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
there are still tribes in the amazon that have very little money, like the hazda. they may not call it retirement but they don't need to go to the office everyday. Serious question, what makes us so addicted and dependent to money tha
43.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
i think you can get a pretty decent prius from 5k to 10k and a fantastic nearly brand new tesla model 3 for 17K. That's what i did. it was 8 years old, practically brand new, FSD prepaid included! it drives me to work and i only pai
44.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
you don't need to eat ramen. there are many cost effective options out there: oatmeal, beans, rice, you could grow your own fruits and vegetables, etc. and as for the medical disaster: heart attack and stroke are actually preventable
45.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
my wife and I regularly eat lotus root, it's quite delicious and common in chinese cooking. the others not so much. On a side note there are 1000s even 10s of thousand of edible plant based species that grow on the earth. i don'
46.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
i would argue that reach has already been the biggest limiting factor for the last 10 even 20 years.
47.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
isn't it just one more step up the hierarchy. 10 years ago most developers have forgotten how to code in machine language because you didn't need to know it. Now, we're jsut going one step higher.
48.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
this is misleading because they're not comparing apples to apples. the insurance companies are looking into all the details I'm sure to be able price the risk accordingly. Lemonade is putting their money where their mouth is and
49.
by heathrow83829 8mo ago
>>> "Still, Wednesday’s report also shows that not nearly as many jobs were added in 2025 as thought and last year will go down as the worst year for hiring since 2020, or since 2003 outside of a recession." Almost no job
50.
by heathrow83829 9mo ago
you always hear about a stream of layoffs but It doesn't give the full picture. what i'm more interested in is what is their total employee count over time. that represents the net hiring net lay offs, is what counts at the end
51.
by heathrow83829 9mo ago
i've wondered this myself. I thought that everyone was selling bonds and just buying equities, gold and bitcoin. isn't that only game plan? bonds aren't investible anymore for anything more than 5 year time horizon.
52.
by heathrow83829 9mo ago
but they're expected to have 8 or 9 aircraft carriers by 2035, doesn't it make sense to wait until then?
53.
by heathrow83829 9mo ago
i'm surprised by this because it's so hard to sell used goods. i have an old suit from graduation that's in perfect condition and looks quite nice. the thing will NOT sell, not even for 10$, at all even though it's pra
54.
by heathrow83829 9mo ago
>> Ideally, codebases would grow by adding data (e.g. a json describing endpoints, UIs, etc), not repetitive code. Be very careful with this approach. there are many ways it can go completely wrong. i've seen a codebase like th
55.
by heathrow83829 10mo ago
i think the whole "personalised advertising" thing is way oversold and more for the benefit of a sales pitch for the advertisers but reality is far from it. google makes their money on volume, not accuracy. and so all the "
56.
by heathrow83829 10mo ago
if you draw a venn diagram of all the stuff i get advertised on and all the stuff I actually buy, the two circles are in completely different locations with virtually no overlap whatsoever. the only time i get ads that are even remotely re
57.
by heathrow83829 10mo ago
it does help. i think this is a good step in the right direction. but there's still a lot of stuff that only parents can do. for example, screentime in the home. you can't really create a law that says no screens for anyone und
58.
by heathrow83829 10mo ago
maybe it's a step in the right direction but you can't regulate away ALL parenting. I know kids in the 5th grade getting brand new Iphone 17s! i've even seen one kid at the age of 7, getting their own Ipad. some parents ev
59.
by heathrow83829 10mo ago
well it matters for your livelihood. if you get "fired' you won't be eligible for unemployment compensation or cobra. if you get laid off, you get unemployment comp. not to mention the negative stigma of being "fired&
60.
by heathrow83829 10mo ago
>> We are never going to see a pre-AI world ever again I mean, to one degree or another, this is correct. somethings are not going back into the genie bottle.

More ›