heaney-555

4 ms·

61.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
I'm not questioning not having streaming services. I'm questioning it actually being cheaper than buying physical media in the long term for anyone who listens to more than the occasional song or watches the occasional movie. If t
62.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>I stream on youtube Right, so then how you really access most of your your music is through advertising or ad-blocking, not CDs.
63.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
You seem to be confusing context-fetching with training.
64.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Then none of his work after June will be included in the training data. What I was referring to is the fact that neither Levent Alpöge nor Tristan Buckmaster will answer this question.
65.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Then none of his work after June 29 will be included in the training data. What I was referring to is the fact that neither Levent Alpöge nor Tristan Buckmaster will answer this question.
66.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>Did you use a model whose training set included user data? OpenAI, as with all AI companies, openly admits that it trains on user data unless the user opts out. But the mathematicians have not said whether or not they opted out. >Did
67.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Multiple OpenAI staff have publicly said they cannot do that as accessing specific user settings without their consent (or legal requirement) violates their internal privacy policy. However, the mathematicians could easily declare whether
68.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
If you could prove that, it would be a gargantuan class-action lawsuit. And there would almost certainly be at least one whistleblower.
69.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
There is no such data for Cybercab (AI4.5). We only have data on that for AI4.
70.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
This is exactly the issue. What the mathematicians could do is reveal whether they had the data-sharing opt-out on or not. But curiously, as far as I've seen, none of them will answer that question!
71.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>It is way cheaper long term. How few songs do you listen to, and movies/shows do you watch, for this to possibly be true?
72.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>I then realized that most people just stick with whatever default they're provided with, and it's a lot of them. This is something I wish more people in tech understood, especially anyone who gets to decide the defaults for po
73.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Right, but God's Eye B isn't anywhere near good enough for unsupervised self-driving. The hardware isn't the issue; the software just isn't in the same league as Tesla FSD.
74.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>For a Tesla, the estimates are around $2K Where are you seeing this? The estimates I've seen all land around $1K.
75.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Cybercab has double the RAM and a bit more memory bandwidth, but otherwise it's the same 8 external mono RGB cameras. It's maybe $1.5K of BoM total for the chip, memory, and cameras.
76.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>I would expect that regulators will require them on all cars That assumes that suppliers are available to affordably add it. So far Tesla is the only company remotely close to unsupervised self-driving that doesn't add $1000s to th
77.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
I haven't experienced anything like this with Codex. Why do people stick with Claude Code if it doesn't do what you ask it to?
78.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Actually, it has been essentially balanced out by a greater need for behind-the-shelves workers to pack and load orders for online/app delivery and eCommerce orders. This is how the economy often works. The loss of one kind of job to t
79.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>If compute is cheap This cost millions of dollars of tokens.
80.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Right: https://x.com/dioscuri/status/2097418466571485272
81.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Not reading the thing you're commenting on is even worse form, yet it seems to be a plague here!
82.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
This is utterly shocking. Even the AI optimists did not expect this to happen in 2026. Wow. Millennium Prize Problems were used as examples of something the current approach to AI just wasn't capable of, discussions that would result i
83.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Did you actually read the article and the substance of the solution? >our proofs differ significantly and even the precise results proved are different in the Euler case (forced vs unforced)
84.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Did you actually read the article and the substance of the solution? >our proofs differ significantly and even the precise results proved are different in the Euler case (forced vs unforced)
85.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
DeepMind objectively is doing that. The world is not so black and white as "evil profit-hungry corporations will never do anything good".
86.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
You are conflating the specific technical limitations of Nano Banana 2 with the general nature of AI. This is akin to the "God of the gaps" fallacy, wherein your worldview is going to be repeatedly decimated by advancements in mod
87.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Most employed (and contracting) humans are prompted repeatedly every day.
88.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
This is the case for all the major AI providers. Training collection is on by default, but you can opt out.
89.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
>you seem to be setting the bar at "fixing the world's problems" No, this is the bar the general public sets for billionaires. They, ignorant of the scale of the problems, believe billionaires could afford to solve the wor
90.
by heaney-555 1mo ago
Because he presents his predictions with extreme confidence, and asserts that anyone who disagrees must be crazy.

More ›