Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hcks
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
“Computa*” this is insane
32.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
Highly doubt that
33.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
I find it funny that a blogpost claiming to be about the “scientific method” spends 4000 words to try to convince its readers of a wordplay, using analogies and metaphors. (Yes “consciousness is an illusion” is a wordplay. If you claim it’s
34.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
Europeans cannot afford it
35.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
The only example given being Alan Turing cracking Enigma is that right? Also yes being a worker sucks.
36.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
Pretty sure 7 figures would be a massive failure in that case
37.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
Can’t wait to have to download 20 different marketplaces with UX all uglier than the last
38.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
> only a third of the economy Yeah and I’m sure the rest is advanced industry and not at all goods and services consumed by the tourism-industry workers and their families
39.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
Im not curious to try Devin. LLM agents suck and have sucked since the first faked demo 2 years ago. I’ll leave it to the real labs (OA, Anthropic, DeepMind, FAIR) to make real advances.
40.
▲
by
hcks
2y ago
To answer your question they aren’t
41.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
There’s basically 0 application of Olympiad maths (what job do you think requires solving these problems?)
42.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
https://x.com/bl4sty/status/1773780531143925959?s=20 So nobody reads releases notes either. But I’m sure this was a one off and were safe now
43.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
It was caught out of luck due to performance degradation. So nobody reads the code - not even once- prior to merging into upstream supply chain?
44.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
No one will do it seriously
45.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
You don’t understand, we really need to be locked in a new walled garden
46.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
No, not everything should be written in the style of a NYT best-seller non-fiction, actually
47.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
Why would someone sell the share for less than this "inherent" value then? Or conversely why would some buy for more than that?
48.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
1/ it’s not rational to promote someone competent at their tasks 2/ there are either ways to reward than promote to a higher level in the management pyramid
49.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
« It’s never possible to innovate » This is currently the top comment on news.ycombinator.com
50.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
I mean the purpose of the agency WAS to buy its owner Ferraris and not servers for IT
51.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
I can’t wait to have to install 30 different app stores to keep installed the apps I currently have
52.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
Honestly it would have been better if they never launched it
53.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
The legal precedent: « IF you’re sued and IF you’re found guilty, then you MAY have to pay LESS than the inflation adjusted cost of paying a commercial license, 20 years in the future »
54.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
The FAANG dream truly is dead
55.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
Has the author tried the trick called free will
56.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
I though Google paid decent salaries, but it turns out even after 15 years there you’re still concerned about making ends meet it seems
57.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
Why would you give free money to YouTube if you control the content
58.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
“YC request for things they would like someone to spend their life on while they get rich making enterprise SaaS”
59.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
“You should base your life decisions on the koolaid flavour you prefer”
60.
▲
by
hcks
3y ago
“16% less likely to want” So a tiny effect, not even measured on what they do, but on how they feel. Again, being a “top—performer” gives you very little negotiating power in itself.
More ›