hbogert

7 ms·

61.
by hbogert 9mo ago
Well the reason they install it is often not to enable the features you bought the license for, which is, on-the-fly scanning. It pushes all IO through a hose in case of windows defender.
62.
by hbogert 9mo ago
I'm salty they are embracing SIMD, but shove this proposal to the side: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/58610 if you know the ISPC compiler, the proposal is basically that for Go
63.
by hbogert 9mo ago
Endpoint software is a blight. My company's M2 pro should have flown through the things i subject it to. But simple things like linting on many files is slower than my 8y old pc on a sata-SSD.
64.
by hbogert 9mo ago
> I really thought `eval` would not be abused on non validated input - your colleague, or you 1 year before.
65.
by hbogert 9mo ago
I'll go continue reading neuromancer and blade runner, it's always good to imprint one selves to what's to come. I'm not talking about the robot and cybernetics part, but the modern feudal system.
66.
by hbogert 9mo ago
It could well be 2 bots having a laugh
67.
by hbogert 9mo ago
> Also IME EVPN is mostly deployed/pushed when clueless app developers expect to have arbitrary L2 reachability across any two points in a (cross DC!) fabric [1], or when they want IP addresses that can follow them around the DC or
68.
by hbogert 9mo ago
If your history looks like in that screenshot, then yeah, you definitely need like software like that
69.
by hbogert 9mo ago
Where is the inception?
70.
by hbogert 9mo ago
my problem is still that i want to use enterprise SSDs, but 2280, alas, as the article mentions they are pretty hard to come by.
71.
by hbogert 9mo ago
It's become unreliable under linux as well. It used to work fine. The whole UEFI including the new si0x or whatever that word is again destroyed a perfectly fine experience all because it seemed like a good idea by microsoft.
72.
by hbogert 9mo ago
I can understand you are like this. Just be upfront about it during interviews. You might be surprised there are companies which are absolutely fine with that. I'm on the other end, I do think your life should revolve around the thing
73.
by hbogert 9mo ago
Or maybe it's too difficult? Or maybe you are just holding it wrong The unpredictability for using things like cursor or Claude code is just a showstopper and indeed I'm not sure it has ever saved me time in the grand scheme of th
74.
by hbogert 10mo ago
Stop it, you are making me nostalgic for a time i never completely lived through. My first memories are of sitting on my father's lap as a 3y old, connecting to a BBS. Even as small as that I understood completely that was special. The
75.
by hbogert 10mo ago
Brother's minor included making webpages. Pure html. That led to listings in a computer magazine for making a guestbook in php more comprehensible. That was in 2001. That was enough to get me hooked. Continued with the java bible and b
76.
by hbogert 10mo ago
I think I would have enjoyed the chronicles back then. Alas too young.
77.
by hbogert 10mo ago
I use magit with emacs, Id say terminal purists and vscoders are missing out. But now I probably sound like that insufferable emacs guy from work.
78.
by hbogert 10mo ago
I hope these systems will just actually learn instead of burning through tokens when deciphering what user wants and just uses golden paths instead of reinventing everything when a user wants the same but uses a slightly different prompt. T
79.
by hbogert 10mo ago
I'm saying this as Kubernetes certified service provider: Just because you can install it with 1 command doesn't mean it's not complex, it's just made easier, not simpler.
80.
by hbogert 10mo ago
That's just making it easier, not simpler. I think the parent means, really a drop-in but simpler k8s
81.
by hbogert 10mo ago
Writing go in yaml and forgetting everything else we learned software engineering. Proper ide's, being able to make abstractions, not copy pasting, structured templating and thus not string based templating, should I go on?
82.
by hbogert 10mo ago
I interpreted the parents post as: as long as my combination of commits results in something working before getting merged, it's fine. Local wip commits didn't come to mind at all
83.
by hbogert 10mo ago
so basically, not adhering to atomic commits. That's fine if it's a deliberate choice, but some people like me think commits should stand on their own. (i'm assuming your are not squashing when merging, else it's pretty
84.
by hbogert 10mo ago
I don't want roundtrips to my CI which easily takes a minute and pushes me to look at yet another window. Pre-commit hooks save me so much time.
85.
by hbogert 10mo ago
why would you lose commit history? You are just picking up a set of commits and reapplying them. Of course you can use rebase for more things, but rebase does not equal losing commit history.
86.
by hbogert 10mo ago
The tongue in cheek is strong in this one ^
87.
by hbogert 10mo ago
Geographically this is unpractical at some locations. Mild understatement. Do you happen to live in a year round sunny place?
88.
by hbogert 10mo ago
Do a git stash of working dir only after your git add -p. This was how the index/staging was meant to be used... I think
89.
by hbogert 10mo ago
It's okay to dislike both parties
90.
by hbogert 10mo ago
When you read your sentence: > This stuff is popular in government or old businesses that may have been slow to (or unable to for regulatory reasons) jump to AWS/GCP etc. I think it's fair to say that you think migrating to the

More ›