Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hawk_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
hawk_
10mo ago
May be the ones that are dead are from poor imitation of more successful bots that are operating in our midst whose comments aren't dead?
32.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
For those discussions with the LLM do you just use Gemini chat or chat GPT etc... i.e. the chat interface?
33.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
For sure no two groups want the same subset but is there no "standard way" to opt in / out in the ecosystem? It's strange that there are large orgs like Google enforcing style guidelines but manual code reviews are requ
34.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
Is there a way to pass compiler switches to disable specific C++ features? Or other static analysis tools that break the build upon using prohibited features?
35.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
I can't imagine those examples you picked implemented in Erlang performing anywhere close to the Zig/C++ ones. So the "ad-hoc subset" there is by design.
36.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
Is Lyme disease much of a problem in Europe though?
37.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
Deceleration requirements are going to be harder than acceleration, one would think so how would you apply full brakes with the same motor?
38.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
When should one use D2 vs graphviz?
39.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
> if a Contributor Distributes Doesn't this only apply to contributors and dev users?
40.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
Yep the JVM structured concurrency implementation is amazing. One thing I got wondering especially when reading this post on HN though is if stackless coroutines could (have) fit the JVM in some way to get even better performance for those
41.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
> If this was done the classical C way, you would always have to stack-save a number of registers I see, so you're saying that GCC can be coaxed into gathering only the relevant registers to stack and unstack not blindly do all of t
42.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
This is amazing to me that you can do this in Zig code directly as opposed to messing with the compiler.
43.
▲
by
hawk_
11mo ago
What do you mean by "buttering the cost of switches", can you elaborate? (I am trying to learn about this topic)
44.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
In poker, like in trading, the key is knowing when you have an edge and being aggressive but also knowing when you have a losing have and cut your losses. It's the balance that makes a good player/trader.
45.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
That's nice. Do you have some tips/tricks based on your experience that you can share?
46.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
> the DB was a "pure overhead" software that aims to minimise memory consumption that's needed for a co-located resource heavy application) Thanks pron for the reply. This describes it the best. To minimize resource consum
47.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
Who is that single customer? I'd have thought by now there would be more.
48.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
Would you say writing something like a database (storage and query engine) from scratch is better done in Rust or Zig?
49.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
What has worked out very well in practice is hyper-threading. So you take instructions from two threads and if one of them is waiting on a branch the units of the CPU don't go unused.
50.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
Not clamp per se, but there are enough tiny snippets which can have off by one or other issues not relevant to when you think about the problem description.
51.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
This is the gap that LLMs have been filling quite well now in my experience. There are these little isolated tasks that are described easily in natural language for which the idiomatic code snippet can be created and importantly modified by
52.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
Oh yes I didn't mean F# is the only one. Just that the other ones I am likely to work with i.e. C++, Java and Python don't have it.
53.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
I miss the F# pipe operator ( https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/language-ref... ) in other languages. It's so natural to think of function transform pipelines. In other languages you have to
54.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
I don't think there's a need to consume it, this looks like a topical application.
55.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
Which you then spit out like chewed up gum.
56.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
But why not chew on hair directly?
57.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
How do you use Rust without lifetimes?
58.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
But then someone has to watch the recording which you can speed up by say 2-4x but not much more than that. This doesn't scale. The number of terrible candidates out there who have no business being anywhere near an IDE is insane.
59.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
Fifty basis points.
60.
▲
by
hawk_
1y ago
Oh ok so colo here means bring your own hardware.
More ›