Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hatefulmoron
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
What is unique about graphic design that warrants such extraordinary care? Should we just ban technology that approaches "replacement" territory? What about the people, real or imagined, that earn a living making Graphviz diagrams
62.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I'm not trying to make a point, just curious -- what's stopping you from spending more money on AI? You could be using more API tokens, more Claude Code and whatever else.
63.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
What if all work is no longer necessary? Then yes, we're going to have to rethink how our society works. Fair enough. I'm a bit confused by your read on the people who don't make it through college. The implication is that if
64.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
Didn't he predict that capitalism will naturally give way to socialism?
65.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
> When we moved from more physical jobs to desk jobs many of us became sedentary and overweight. Now we are in an "obesity crisis". There's multiple factors to that, it's not just being in desk jobs, but being sedenta
66.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
> my point is that I think after driving a tractor for a while, the kid would really struggle to go hoe by hand like he used to, if he ever needed to That's true in the short term, but let's be real, tilling soil isn't lik
67.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I don't think that's been true for a while now -- computers are that much better.
68.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
Rust uses AI to ensure that C/C++ programmer mistakes do not happen in unsafe blocks. "unsafe" is a misnomer.
69.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I literally just asked ChatGPT and Claude, they both clarified to me that Rust is safe. The website for Rust even says so. If you have any questions, I would be happy to forward them to my ChatGPT Pro subscription, and then relay the answer
70.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
You're confused by the word 'unsafe', which is a misnomer. Rust. The point of 'unsafe' is to indicate that the compiler should be extra careful when compiling the code, because you're about to do something that
71.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
The article says it right there: unsafe is used to give you unsafe superpowers. This is important for the quantum entanglement that the string uses. Unsafe brings the power (superpowers enabled by the compiler), while the Rust compiler ensu
72.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
You seem to be saying that Rust code can be unsafe, perhaps you're thinking of the profoundly unsafe and deprecated C or C++ languages?
73.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
Without it, we can't use the quantum enhanced string, which is safe because it's written in Rust.
74.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I don't think the length you're talking about is that much of an issue. As you say, depending on how you measure it, LLMs are better at remaining accurate over a long span of text. The issue seems to be more in the intelligence de
75.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I've used the deep research features from OpenAI, Grok, and most recently Anthropic. They're super impressive, but I can't shake the feeling that they're mostly giving me a summarized explanation of what the first 2 page
76.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I get what you're saying, yeah. I would predict (not an economist, some guy on the internet) that unless you outlaw working over a certain number of hours, people will work more hours than ideal and it would push everyone else to do th
77.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I think you're confused. I'm not making any moral judgements or prescriptions here. If you want to change society such that we're not working in exchange for money, then go ahead. Overtime is an example of a policy which limi
78.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I had assumed that the Y axis was corresponding to some measurement of the LLM's ability to actually work/mull over a task in a loop while making progress. In other words, I thought it meant something like "you can leave Sonn
79.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
> I’d expect your principles put you firmly against overtime pay. No.. if society wants to disincentive over working by introducing overtime, that's fine by me. I'm not making any moral judgement. You just seem to live in a fan
80.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
> there aren’t a ton of good options for workers seeking shorter hours. But you do have that option, right? Work 20 hours a week instead of 40. You just aren't paid for the hours that you don't work. In a world where workers ar
81.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
> Actually, LLMs function similarly to brains! > .. but if they don't, it doesn't matter because they could be functionally better than humans! > .. but if they're not, it's just because they aren't there y
82.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
> Yeah, if you’re into playing stupid mind games while not even being right. If I ask questions outside of the things I already know about (probably pretty common, right?), it's not playing mind games. It's only a 'gotcha&
83.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
I'm a World of Warcraft & Dota 2 player, using "the meta" in that way is pretty common in gaming these days I think. The "meta" is still the 'metagame' in the competitive ecosystem sense, but it also r
84.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
1y ago
It's incredible when I ask Claude 3.7 a question about Typescript/Python and it can generate hundreds of lines of code that are pretty on point (it's usually not exactly correct on first prompt, but it's coherent). I
85.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
2y ago
> One example is enough to disprove the "not capable of" nonsense. There are other examples too. Gotcha, fair enough. Throw enough chess data in during training, I'm sure they'd be pretty good at chess. I don't r
86.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
2y ago
> That might be overstating it, at least if you mean it to be some unreplicable feat. I mean, surely there's a reason you decided to mention 3.5 turbo instruct and not.. 3.5 turbo? Or any other model? Even the ones that came after?
87.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
2y ago
3.5 turbo instruct is a huge outlier. https://dynomight.substack.com/p/chess Discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42138289
88.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
2y ago
Maybe someone can explain it to me, but isn't that slide sort of just describing what makes solving problems hard in general? That there are many more decisions which put you on an inevitable path of failure? "Probability e that a
89.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
2y ago
The LLM's output is chaotic relative to the input, but it's deterministic right? Same settings, same model, same input, .. same output? Where does the chain get broken here?
90.
▲
by
hatefulmoron
2y ago
Which comment claimed that LLMs were marketed as super-intelligence? I'm looking up the chain and I can't see it. I don't think they were, but I think it's pretty clear they were marketed as being the imminent path to su
More ›