harrisoned

6 ms·

31.
by harrisoned 1y ago
I agree its an amazing payment method, it worked for me for most of the time. Still, we depend on bank's stability and technical availability for it to work. Once i needed to pay for something and forgot my card at home, at that same t
32.
by harrisoned 2y ago
It is. A friend of mine has this. It took her so much time to actually seek help, despite the excruciating pain, and she got part of her digestive system removed because it spread too much. Nowadays, after 2 years of the surgery, she manage
33.
by harrisoned 2y ago
I have a big issue with this, and the truth is that the majority of people simply do not care and/or do not understand the implications. By tying your service to a smartphone your are basically refusing to provide service if the costum
34.
by harrisoned 2y ago
I agree with that. At work, we are about to implement a decent LLM and ditch Dialogflow for our chatbot. But not to talk directly to the client (it's asking for a disaster), just to recognize intentions, pretty much like Dialogflow but
35.
by harrisoned 2y ago
It certainly has use cases, just not as many as the hype lead people to believe. For me: -Regex expressions: ChatGPT is the best multi-million regex parser to date. -Grammar and semantic check: It's a very good revision tool, helped me
36.
by harrisoned 2y ago
I'm curious about the ToS. As far as i know, their version of ChatGPT on Copilot don't like +18/sexual stuff, so how would the Copilot+ react to a lot of it? Would you get banned? would it work? Would it simple ignore all the
37.
by harrisoned 2y ago
I did that with Llama 3 8B with some stuff i could think of, and it did very good. It was on par with GPT4. I prompted some scenarios and asked it to use CoT. Scenarios like "i was standing and eating chocolate, and it melted. Will i f
38.
by harrisoned 2y ago
I personally don't use LLMs to code, besides a few snippets or when i'm out of ideas what/how do to. But models like Starcoder and Code Llama is what i see people often using for this purpose. There are benchmarks for various
39.
by harrisoned 2y ago
If your intention is coding something complex, you should try a model finetuned for that, i don't think llama 3 is that good for coding. But i used standart prompt engineering stuff, same as from llama 2. Instead of chat, you use a com
40.
by harrisoned 2y ago
I'm playing with the llama 3 8b instruct model out of curiosity, and it is insanely better than the llama 2 on that regard. It's almost like a fully uncensored model. it did refused to make pentest scripts when i asked, which is f
41.
by harrisoned 3y ago
Just like many here have said already, GPT4 is being useful for coding for me. It is an amazing parser, specially, and save me precious time. Of course it's not able to do anything on it's own or without supervision, but is has be
42.
by harrisoned 3y ago
I wonder if they where really offended or it was an impulsive overreaction on their part :P In times where people like that exists, chatbots that can swear are weapons of mass destruction.
43.
by harrisoned 3y ago
> There is a good chance they might sue OpenAI for it. Indeed there is! Companies have been sued (and lost) for way less than that. But it begs the question: should the user not know better? Is it really the company's fault, even wi
44.
by harrisoned 3y ago
I get it that companies want to distance themselves for bad stuff those LLMs output. But what baffles me is the way they deal with this issue. Nowadays if you share or reproduce anything controversial, is as if you are endorsing such conten
45.
by harrisoned 3y ago
I think that is the biggest reason for the excessive safety as well. Just like all services try to be safe for those same things. What do puzzles me is why those companies act that way. Is it because costumers are dumb enough to not differe
46.
by harrisoned 3y ago
Well, "safely" is subjective i guess. This means an AI that will not "get rogue and kill us all" or an AI that will not swear back at the user or generate unethical content even when prompted? I am really not concerned a
47.
by harrisoned 3y ago
It is. But wasn't worth the trouble to fight over it.
48.
by harrisoned 3y ago
Here, in Brazil, this is becoming more and more common, but in the US it's already an endemic problem for those who don't use tech. My biggest issue with all this comes to the forced dependency of 3rd party services and ToS agreem
49.
by harrisoned 3y ago
Nine years ago, during the interview with the manager of a textile company, he asked what my religion was. I said i didn't had any, and then he said "You know what happens with people who don't follow any religion, right?&quo
50.
by harrisoned 3y ago
I started watching Farscape a few weeks ago after seeing many recommendations, critics, and because it's free to watch on Plex. Now i see why people say what they say.
51.
by harrisoned 3y ago
I think Meta did a very good job with Llama2, i was skeptical at first with all that talk about 'safe AI'. Their Llama-2 base model is not censored in any way, and it's not fine-tuned as well. It's the pure raw base mode
52.
by harrisoned 3y ago
Non-tech people can use it with no issues, my whole company uses it. People just need to pay attention to what they are doing, and be organized. At the beginning it can be kinda painfull, but it's all worth it.
53.
by harrisoned 3y ago
I work at a small-to-medium sized ISP, and we use pure Redmine since 2018 for documentation, and 'internal tickets'. It's a really good tool, helped us get really organized. You can customize the heck out of it, nowadays we h
54.
by harrisoned 3y ago
While i think bots and AI is indeed widespread, i think this percentage is accurate only in very specific places. The internet isn't dead, sometimes we (tech people) don't take in consideration how much of the world actually uses
55.
by harrisoned 3y ago
i don't know if this is real in France, but here in Brazil, there is a bill trying to do the same thing (hasn't passed yet). Social media would be obligated to pay news outlets, and on the Chapter VII, Article 32, § 6º it says: &g
56.
by harrisoned 3y ago
This is what i mean by underlying problems. Every extremist organization lures people with manipulative tactics, and if you are not in a good state of mind to spot those, you will be caught. That's why education and knowledge about tho
57.
by harrisoned 3y ago
> Why is the blame on people for what is made available to them? This wouldn't be 'protecting people from their own mental and moral malleability,' this would be preventing others from making this which abuse those malleab
58.
by harrisoned 3y ago
> Do they? They do. Can they be influenced? Yes. Can they be coerced trough social pressure? Yes. Can they fall for targeted advertisement and/or manipulation? Yes as well. Does this exclude the responsibility of their own actions?
59.
by harrisoned 3y ago
> The hard fact that a community where our 'median commenter' is above the median in the general population hates to realize is that roughly 1/3 or so of all people are just not remotely the type of person who can do the a
60.
by harrisoned 3y ago
The example is good, and look where we are. Regulation brings immediate partial results to a problem, but doesn't solve it. I agree that the problem should be resolved, but those methods are only put in place to please shareholders and

More ›