harlequinetcie

6 ms·

31.
by harlequinetcie 11mo ago
We are working on desplega.ai, and we are toying with this long term vision https://www.pleasedontdeploy.com/p/the-trap-we-automated-cod... I would love feedback on the post, how do you see the tech stack for software
32.
by harlequinetcie 1y ago
In my limited experience, every team has a way to track if 'the system is working according to the business specs' beyond actual traces, or QA. To simplify it, in an e-commerce you would like to verify your inventory goes down acc
33.
Ask HN: What are you using for Semantic Monitoring?
1 points by harlequinetcie 1y ago|2 comments
34.
by harlequinetcie 1y ago
<rant> How many people are running LLMs CLIs instead of using their APIs? It seems so obnoxious to me that using a CLI command is cheaper than using their APIs, hence forcing them to build these kind of work arounds. Maybe I'm no
35.
The future of your code is no-code(pleasedontdeploy.com)
1 points by harlequinetcie 1y ago|1 comments
36.
by harlequinetcie 1y ago
Who has a better blue-print on what would actually mean to have ephemeral code, as we do with assembly nowadays, and instead have a repo with prompts to generate your software? I've been looking into frameworks like https://
37.
by harlequinetcie 1y ago
I found out for me 90%+ of the costs were due to their testing functionality that seems extremely expensive.
38.
Show HN: From selling AI to QA teams to building a smooth test-management app(tester.desplega.ai)
5 points by harlequinetcie 1y ago|0 comments
39.
Ask HN: Is it worth investing on gamifying your app early on?
2 points by harlequinetcie 1y ago|1 comments
40.
by harlequinetcie 1y ago
I would ask myself what am I actually paying for here. -- as mentioned in other comments, they could always have a peer next to them during a call, so hallucinations won't do -- + Using AI is actually cheating or being productive for t