hardbass

6 ms·

61.
by hardbass 1mo ago
>I can answer any question you have. Just let me know. Who or what does (a) the CN Tower, (b) the Space Needle, (c) the Empire State Building, (d) your house glorify? >You can't get the depth of brushstrokes or color for example.
62.
by hardbass 1mo ago
I call it a soul by any other terms.
63.
by hardbass 1mo ago
In that case you should be able to answer the questions for each of the three buildings. Or the house you live in. Level of detail is very objective. Are you saying degas is more detailed than that bansky piece? How is graffiti limited by t
64.
by hardbass 1mo ago
I looked up that architect. His buildings look stunning to me. What is your issue with them?
65.
by hardbass 1mo ago
You seem to have some memory issues I think. You were the one who brought up the question of who a building glorifies, not me. It was you. You should be able to justify what you yourself said. Why is it suddenly unimportant? If it was unimp
66.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Its as objective as it gets in art as eg saying the Space Needle building is not a Roman style building. Banksy clearly does not belong to any 20th century abstract or modern movement at all. Its objectively absurd and wrong to claim so. Th
67.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Bansky is simply not modern art at all. This is not a personal opinion, it is simple objective fact. Banksy is not remotely modern or abstract art. You are absolutely absurd in thinking so. Pop art is representational and not remotely abstr
68.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Intent is not very relevant to the effect it has on people. You can make a building for any reason you want. Modern neoclassicism doesn't glorify any particular person, it may glorify the State or some Institution. Brutalism also doesn
69.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Architecture. In both neoclassicism and brutalism, regardless of intended aim, the effect seems to be one of silublime monumental scale that humbles a person. Both paintings you cited are very much on the traditional and representative end
70.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Lack of drivability isn't just a mechanical thing, it shapes how a locality lives and moves, the kind of community that can form or not and also mood eg whether distances cause a feeling of isolation or one of not feeling cooped up and
71.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Yes but how do you think it will lead to a war? Explain the sequence of events.
72.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Canada starts neutral. UK starts anti. Very easy.
73.
by hardbass 1mo ago
The far right wing stupidity needs to run its course. There's nothing outside forces could have done to prevent it, attempts by EU to steer the Brexit issue would only have led to accusations of "EU interference" and casued a
74.
by hardbass 1mo ago
How will a voluntary organization with no military force cause a world war,.while actual physical war is being waged by Russia right in its neighborhood? Tell me immediately and bluntly in full the mechanism of EU causing a world war right
75.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Far right wing and nationalism caused two world wars in european soil. May or may not be related. And right wing parties themselves generally hate the EU, so nobody is asking for it anyways.
76.
by hardbass 1mo ago
I really don't understand this heisenberg nonsense at all. If he wants to join he should say (and prove) that, if he doesn't want to join then directly say that.
77.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Whats wrong in laughing at farage? You left, if you eant to rejoin then you have to make the case and prove you are ready for it. The EU can't read your brain, why should it invite when you left. It should not even invite unlesss you d
78.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Many countries in Asia use concrete by default. People don't seem to have any problems with it. Architecture obviously impacts a person's mood and behavior, eg unwalkable architecture would force a lot of driving. I just am not ce
79.
by hardbass 1mo ago
How can EU be the one expected to be inviting when they didn't kick the UK out in the first place? The UK is the one that left on its own. The EU doesn't have to do anything, I think they are quite open to the UK or anyone else in
80.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Then why are you complaining they didn't invite your country?
81.
by hardbass 1mo ago
I am not talking about some abstract honesty to some subtance. I am saying if someone dislikes an architectural style they shouldn't blame it on the materials. Some people like wood for a rustic look. I can make a cabinet with wood tha
82.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Elsewhere you are saying you disagree with the way the EU is structured, which makes it even more absurd why you want to join it. Don't like it, leave it. Like it, put a vote to join. Like some aspects, dislike others, then state speci
83.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Your country chose to divorce of its own will, the EU didn't kick you out. It is not a forcible organization like being a citizen in a country, its completely voluntary. So why the hell are you whining about the EU ignoring you when yo
84.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Its nonsense. If a building has people and businesses, it is good, if it doesn't and has druggies it will feel bad. An unmaintained mansion with druggies will be equally creepy. I am not sure how you are saying a place is inviting of d
85.
by hardbass 1mo ago
You seem extremely confused. Why do you want your ex partner to treat you nicely when you yourself stated you hate them? Do you want to force a relationship again despite the other party not wanting you or even you yourself wanting it? You
86.
by hardbass 1mo ago
If your country initiated a divorce, it makes no sense for the other party to invite you again. You should have to request first and show to them eg with a vote you won't again flake out in a few years.
87.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Then that means Canada must build overwhelming firepower clearly and mine the border to hell, build anti aircraft systems everywhere and take whatever steps needed to prevent and repel an unprovoked invasion, just like it is logical for Ukr
88.
by hardbass 1mo ago
That building looks normal to me. Any building would feel ugly if its less inhabited and full of druggies and homeless. Its not about high mindedness. Tell me suppose you took steel started making cuboids out of it and sanding it rough then
89.
by hardbass 1mo ago
Building design is not sex.
90.
by hardbass 1mo ago
I find it very irritating looking at fake or overdone things. I don't think that's minority. Each era of architecture was suited in some way to the building materials and technology of it's time. I do not understand this move

More ›