hansmayer

20 ms·

91.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
No buddy, not me. Dario Amodei however, keeps announcing it every about 6 months, on the dot. Last time i January this year. So I just want them held acccountable to their own statements. Otherwise if they would be untrue, that is at best
92.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
> But it seems everyone is arguing about whether LLMs can be perfect software engineers That's just those of us with longer memory holding the AI companies to the standards they declared themselves. Nobody forced Sam Altman to blab
93.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
You took it too literally. It means, the f*ing tool should do one thing well and f*off with its crappy "suggestions". Why is my washing machine trying to do talk to me nowadays? Once its done washing my clothes, it should just shu
94.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Such fantastic writing. I particularly love the last passage - not only it is reminiscent of how great op-eds used to close, but also for it's clear and un-ambigious call to action - you have the agency and no, you don't have to &
95.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
> People were upset about databases in the 1980s Huh? In what universe did that happen?
96.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Oh, they don't mean helpful to you . What they mean is, helpful to their revenue.
97.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
"guttoral" ? I'd learn to write first, before holding others lessons :)
98.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
It was exactly my opinion after thinking about this for a while. This is essentially Google making their search engine into yet another website. Sure, there is certain inertia - people used to using Google - but it will fade out with new ge
99.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
This is what social media and LLMs have done to the average member of the society - one has to explain to folks like you everything literally, because you're not able to infer anything on your own any more. Where do you think the waste
100.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
I guess you need to understand the deeper meaning implied by that comment. It's OK if you don't - unfortunately social media and now LLMs have strongly impacted the average Joe's or average Teddy's ability to understand
101.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
I mean if you are going to use AI which was trained on code of statistically mediocre average at the best, have outages and major incidents every few days, why not go wild and start publishing incidents to twitter too? It checks out with th
102.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Actually it was shown a couple of times already, some of it also by Anthropic's own research, that the LLMs are extremely easy to poison with small datasets.
103.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Finally an AI project with a sense of purpose!
104.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
TL;DR: "Coding agents got really good - here, a bunch of non-releavant slop-pictures of pelicans riding bikes as a key benchmark AND a couple of hardly relevant edge-case demo-projects of mine to prove it right! " Come on man, w
105.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
> where they need the world's best software engineers For what, to write regex to check for number of "fucks" given in prompts, or to write 20k LoC files with 20 levels of nesting ? As we saw in that Claude code leak recen
106.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Not everyone is a "coder" you know, some of us are engineers.
107.
Generative AI's Existential Cringe(whatwelo.st)
3 points by hansmayer 5mo ago|0 comments
108.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
No, answer my question - it's not that hard!
109.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Indeed you did, but that does not make it right. They are not interchangeable. Now again, did you, or did you not promote Bitcoin?
110.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
> To quite Ilya Sutskever: Who made Ilya Sutskever, or any other LLM-bonehead the Grand Prophet of Humanity? Why the fuck is his opinion on that relevant? Of course he will shill for data centers.
111.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
I dunno... but those self-quotes sound a lot like at least implying that "missing out on crypto" would be like missing out on early days of Internet. You also seem to try and retrofit "blockchain" instead of "cryp
112.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Blockchain as a technology was something a lot of people were interested in. I am curious about Bitcoin - the monopoly money of the real world. The questions was simple: did you, or did you not, promote Bitcoin? Anyone who would promote a f
113.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Yeah, beyond this mumbo-jumbo non-answer of yours, did you or did you not push crypto? Because if you did...it could kind of not speak for your analytical competence.
114.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
The kids are alright ;)
115.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
? How TF is it not representative, if it provides interface to literally ALL the major models?? What are you talking about mate?
116.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
> shows you don't understand how Copilot's previous billing worked Having used it for > 4 years and having paid for it for > 2.5 years, I think I know full well how it's previous billing worked. > You could make
117.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
[flagged]
118.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
> Tokens will get cheaper > it costs OpenAI less money to serve GPT-5.5 than GPT-4 > Ppl don't understand how much efficiency gains are being made I guess "ppl" also don't understand then, with all the supposed
119.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
Let me state it again in plain language: How much revenue did the project create and what economic or societal value in general does it create? Gamification bullshit "achievements", like StackOverflow badges and GitHub stars ARE N
120.
by hansmayer 5mo ago
So, they talked the government of Malta into picking up the tab for ChatShit-Generator ?

More ›