hannasanarion

5 ms·

31.
by hannasanarion 4mo ago
This is a big part of it. When you spent less time making something than you expect consumers to spend watching it, the message it sends is an insult. Doubly so if the product also has quality problems inherent in AI art, video, music, not
32.
by hannasanarion 4mo ago
> The post was titled "Midjourney Medical", but it approached everything from a "wellness" perspective, i.e. how can individuals "optimize" their health by numerous scans/tests/analyses, it's
33.
by hannasanarion 4mo ago
That's just to restore the internal state when you reload your save file, so that, for instnace, if you save and quit while looking at a set of card rewards, but haven't made your choice yet, when you reload, you will see the same
34.
by hannasanarion 4mo ago
You're confusing RNG manipulation (really clearly bad, basically cheating by removing the randomness from the game) from RNG prediction (less bad but still unfun, being able to predict future random states). You can be safe from RNG ma
35.
by hannasanarion 5mo ago
The "incredibly low costs" part is part of the classic AI discussion, but it's not part of this AI discussion. The article makes clear, it is describing not a hypothetical future trend, but the trend that we are seeing to
36.
by hannasanarion 7mo ago
It's an extreme example that shortens the time frame and shrinks the cast of characters to illustrate the point. Substitute "telling the truck driver to run stop signs" with "order the factory to increase production&quot
37.
by hannasanarion 7mo ago
Financials aren't like technology or IP where having the information open to all (perhaps with limited monopolies on usage a la patents) is essentially for the betterment of all mankind, they can be more like order of battle in a war z
38.
by hannasanarion 7mo ago
How? "AI fincancing bad" is starting to seem like a new non sequitur meme. There's no imaginary thing being traded for indefensible valuations in AI dealings. Stock units at a certain valuation exchanged for an equivalant val
39.
by hannasanarion 7mo ago
I feel like there's detail missing in the blog. The "Reliable vs Unreliable" section implies that different parts of the scene are sent using a strict-ordering protocol so that the transforms happen in the same order on every
40.
by hannasanarion 7mo ago
Exactly this. I've made some MCP servers and attached tons of other people's MCP servers to my llms and I still don't understand why we can't just use OpenAPI. Why did we have to invent an entire new transport protocol f
41.
by hannasanarion 8mo ago
But it doesn't look human. Read the text, it is full of pseudo-profound fluff, takes way too many words to make any point, and uses all the rhetorical devices that LLMs always spam: gratuitous lists, "it's not x it's y&q
42.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
People keep saying this but it's simply untrue. AI inference is profitable. Openai and Anthropic have 40-60% gross margins. If they stopped training and building out future capacity they would already be raking in cash. They're lo
43.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
Read the paper dude. It's not an advertisement, it's an investigation. They performed an experiment including 29 human written papers. One of them got a score of 11% likely to be AI, the rest got a score of 0% likely to be AI. The
44.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
It's not, but the fact that one sentence deserves a high score doesn't automatically mean that entire thing will flag false positive. Unless it's like, two sentences in total.
45.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
Science fiction is as old as fiction. The Epic of Gilgamesh (2000BC) and Ramayana (500BC) have sci-fi elements. There's nothing innovative or unique about stories that imagine a future instead of a past, present, or alternate reality.
46.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
> Turnitin is only ~90% effective: No it isn't. Stop. The cynical part of me says that the people who share this link with that summary are the cheaters trying to avoid getting caught, on the basis of the fact that they are patently
47.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
> There is also the mix: if I write two pages and I used two sentences by AI (because I was tired and I couldn't find the right sentence), I may be flagged for using AI. None of these tools are binary. They give a percentage score,
48.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
No, read the paper. They're going to pass 10% of students who cheated. The 90% figure is the false negative rate, how many AI essays it says are human. The false positive rate is 0. The tool * never* says human writing is AI.
49.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
That's not what 90% effective means. Tests don't work that way. Tests can be wrong in two different ways, false positive, and false negative. The 90% figure (which people keep rounding up from 86% for some reason, so I'll use
50.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
The Gen Z revolution would have gone nowhere had the Nepalese Military not launched a coup, removed the existing government from power at gunpoint, and asked the protesters who to replace them with. So, fine, there's a third condition:
51.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
* or mass-scale mutinies from the military itself giving the revolutionaries access to artillery, tanks, planes, and ships while the regime has none.
52.
by hannasanarion 9mo ago
No rebellion or revolt had ever been successful without arms supplied from outside sponsors. Random personal small arms that a bunch of people just happen to have at home are not enough to win a revolutionary war against a professional mili
53.
by hannasanarion 10mo ago
That's literally exactly what they do. This is why you should consider reading beyond headlines from time to time. > You give Mozilla the rights necessary to operate Firefox. This includes processing your data as we describe in the
54.
by hannasanarion 10mo ago
Right, but the question then is, would it actually have been contracted out ? I've played RPGs, I know how this works: you either Google image search for a character you like and copy/paste and illegally print it, or you just lea
55.
by hannasanarion 10mo ago
This is an absurd take. The meaning of "selling" is extremely broad, courts have found such language to apply to transactions as simple as providing an http request in exchange for an http response. Their lawyers must have been be
56.
by hannasanarion 10mo ago
> All of these AI outputs are both polluting the commons where they pulled all their training data AND are alienating the creators of these cultural outputs via displacement of labor and payment No dispute on the first part, but I really
57.
by hannasanarion 11mo ago
That is true for all media purchases since the invention of copyright in 1662. You think you own the Silmarillion because you have a paper copy? Hah! No, you have a transferrable license to read it. Every hard copy movie you have starts wit
58.
by hannasanarion 11mo ago
The same is true for Steam games.
59.
by hannasanarion 11mo ago
Xbox One/PS4 is when both sides standardized on BluRay. When Xbox360 and PS3 came out, the format war was only just starting, and the consoles were on either side of it. PS3 came with a BluRay drive and the games were delivered on Bl
60.
by hannasanarion 1y ago
This title is misleading. The article doesn't say that the chat history will be used as evidence, only that it exists. Whether it can be used in court is an unsettled question, as explained in the last few paragraphs.

More ›