handojin

12 ms·

91.
by handojin 11y ago
Is not possible. No context.
92.
by handojin 11y ago
The Ethics? http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm
93.
by handojin 11y ago
The 80s birthed the smiths. Their like has not been seen again.
94.
by handojin 12y ago
There's a hiccup like syntax within reagent which produces output via clojurescript. So (:div (... )) in your cljs.core turns into a react component. There's also kioo if you like the enlive approach better.
95.
by handojin 12y ago
A thousand times yes. With a suitably rocking implementation (as outlined by other posters up/down of me) this would be a net benefit to everyone not just the deaf. The number of people on this thread who think this is a zero sum game
96.
by handojin 12y ago
EDIT: for clarity, removing rhetoricals Strictly speaking it's not ad hominem . A careful reader will see that nowhere has (s)he called you a "spoiled petulant, self entitled child". You're merely being asked to explain
97.
by handojin 12y ago
You are arguing from an abstract position. The universities in question have already chosen to provide free educational resources and are now being sued to provide a reasonable accommodation to allow a subset of the population access to
98.
by handojin 12y ago
I will take that bet, if you explain the odds you are offering.
99.
by handojin 12y ago
The standard is reasonable accommodation . Having someone walk the soup to people unable to climb the steps might perhaps constitute reasonable accommodation and not be an undue burden on the soup kitchen (which we'll assume for t
100.
by handojin 12y ago
You seem angry and you are constructing a false dichotomy. No one is arguing that content should not be released, just that content, produced in institutions which are recipients of federal grants, should be made available to the widest pos
101.
by handojin 12y ago
Why? To discuss the law 'as it should be' invites nothing but a cacophony of opinion. On what basis could such a conversation proceed? If I were uncharitable, I would suggest that such a discussion would serve only one function: t
102.
by handojin 12y ago
Nobody is making it impossible. People are asking (by means of the public courts, as is their right) for equal access to that knowledge.
103.
by handojin 12y ago
Nobody is telling them it's illegal to do so. Merely that they must pay for excluding the 'deaf part of humanity'.
104.
by handojin 12y ago
Harvard and MIT receive (accept) grants from the federal government for producing their content. It's reasonable to expect that in making this content available, they will accommodate all taxpayers. IOW, I'm not sure you understan
105.
by handojin 12y ago
That is really cool. This focus on time is what draws me into the whole clojure/datomic world. We're ill equipped to handle it. Tools help. Does time itself reveal itself as the horizon of being?
106.
by handojin 12y ago
disclaimer: no actual experience of this but... the scheme shell maybe? scsh.net here's some snippets: http://scsh.net/contrib/wiki/CodeSnippets.html
107.
by handojin 12y ago
Yes. To all three questions. Two points: First, the concept of LSD user is misguided. In soviet Russia LSD uses you. Second, the world is larger.
108.
by handojin 12y ago
Nope. Ken MacLeod's 'learning the world'. The alien space bats were a nice touch. Charles Stross' book accelerando has an interesting take on the Fermi paradox too.
109.
Kparc(kparc.com)
1 points by handojin 12y ago|0 comments
110.
by handojin 12y ago
+1 - This is by far the sanest approach to rdbms interaction I've seen. It's kind of sad that we're stuck with SQL but while we're stuck with it we should stick to it. :P
111.
by handojin 12y ago
There are better languages. Tutorial D, the dataphor implementation D4 and datalog (as implemented for datomic e.g.) spring to mind.
112.
by handojin 12y ago
Chris Date, Database in Depth No idea if legal... http://uk-corp.org/Books/Database/Database_in_Depth.pdf
113.
by handojin 13y ago
Obviously effete. The only real point of distinction is where to open the egg and the answer is never 'middle'.
114.
by handojin 13y ago
For a second I misread you as saying Discipline and Punish 'has embedded technological controls...' Which, depressingly, might be true. :P
115.
Wolfram Language Overview(reference.wolfram.com)
1 points by handojin 13y ago|0 comments
116.
by handojin 13y ago
Or make an economic decision to prioritize revenue. We went a different route. No blame. Everyone should read Foucault though.
117.
by handojin 13y ago
Matthew Stewart's "the management myth" runs with this thesis. Google it - the Atlantic article is a great read. He explicitly links the Tom Peters types with televangelists and self help infomercial pitchmen.