hananova

8 ms·

121.
by hananova 7mo ago
Scammers will just start the process and call back the next day. There is an entire genre of scam relying on slowly building rapport and only cashing in once all the way at the end.
122.
by hananova 7mo ago
Because we’re currently still in the phase where lawmakers are telling tech companies “please find a solution for this issue.” At some point, as has happened in the past with other issues, this will change to “solve this issue, here’s exact
123.
by hananova 7mo ago
> The sender could hypothetically have spent real effort in the chat interaction that led up to the ctrl-C moment […] Irrelevant. As soon as the ctrl-c moment happened, all of the real effort became worthless and utterly overwhelmed by t
124.
by hananova 7mo ago
Or a reasonable door number three: Trading on it should not be allowed, without exception.
125.
by hananova 7mo ago
A deep thanks for the choice of license. I’m also curious how long until you get a DMCA claim (despite the well-reasoned legal basis as described in the readme.)
126.
by hananova 7mo ago
Ad-hominem (literally: "to the person") requires a person on the other side of the argument. This wasn't made or written by a person, thus ad-hominem does not apply.
127.
by hananova 7mo ago
I honestly do not see the point of going to all the trouble of playing on hardware, to then convert it to HDMI. At that point just running Mesen on a PC can give you the exact same experience for none of the cost. Hell, it's the reason
128.
by hananova 7mo ago
I'm a non-english-speaking peasant. I code in English, because it's the lingua franca of coding, and because they form the only characters that you can reliably use everywhere. Besides, that's why the ban only extends to synt
129.
by hananova 7mo ago
I'm not sure what the value of that would be. The point of a cycle accurate emulation (not replacement, emulation. It may be an FPGA, but it's still hardware emulation) FPGA implementation is to have lagfree and accurate output to
130.
by hananova 7mo ago
Okay, and?
131.
by hananova 7mo ago
My hot take is that all programming languages should go back to only accepting source code saved in 7-bit ASCII. With perhaps an exception for comments.
132.
by hananova 7mo ago
> but will miss players with simple ESP. False, people that have information they shouldn't have will act in detectable ways, even if they try their hardest not to.
133.
by hananova 7mo ago
That's not how it works. You're making the extraordinary claim that a widely trusted and strictly moderated encyclopedia with tons and tons of citations to back up the truthfulness of its contents is not mostly true. You get to pr
134.
by hananova 7mo ago
But many people do call Wikipedia neutral, or at least mostly neutral.
135.
by hananova 7mo ago
Digital speakers don’t exist. No matter how the signal gets there, the end result is wiggling air in an analog process.
136.
by hananova 7mo ago
Well yes, but so is reality. And Wikipedia as an encyclopedia is supposed to document reality. So what's the problem?
137.
by hananova 7mo ago
Maybe not all of it, but a vast majority of it is. And almost certainly the parts that drove Elon to slopify it are true.
138.
by hananova 7mo ago
Sales are artificial boosts yes. The difference is in the connotation. A sale is given for something that people generally would buy anyway, but now more people will. An artificial boost is given to stuff nobody wants, but at a lower price
139.
by hananova 7mo ago
To not frame the amorality and negative effects centrally and primarily is to be dishonest. There is absolutely not a single person whose wage doesn't rely on not seeing it, that doesn't see that that entire branch of tech has str
140.
by hananova 7mo ago
Ethically, if you do not agree with the company you work at, the optimal course of action if you can stomach it is to stay and do a bad job rather than get replaced by someone who might do a good job. I have been in such a situation before,
141.
by hananova 7mo ago
I'll take fewer startups if the tradeoff is actual consumer and human rights. I don't even think it's a morally debatable tradeoff.
142.
by hananova 7mo ago
The law is, and should be, B. Retailers that wish to avoid future hardship can prepare by pre-stocking some replacement parts like in C, but I don’t think laws should protect retailers from their poor financial choices. The law should stric
143.
by hananova 7mo ago
We never got caught or fired. I won’t detail the 0-days we used because I’m pretty sure the team is still using them, but I can assure you that the logs DID lie.
144.
by hananova 7mo ago
Yeah but why should I care? That’s not how consent works. A million yesses and a single no still evaluates to a hard no.
145.
by hananova 7mo ago
I used to work in test automation for a huge company with terribly annoying IT. I can tell you for a fact that our entire department had well-developed workarounds for the most annoying policies. We even had a few intune 0-days that we lite
146.
by hananova 7mo ago
Hi. No, the purpose of a ban is to ban the behavior. I hope this helps.
147.
by hananova 7mo ago
Projects that used to take months still take months. LLM’s are only useful for throwaway low-quality slop. Perhaps some times the sloperator will get lucky and the end result isn’t something that will bite them in the ass. But the rest of u
148.
by hananova 7mo ago
I’m not convinced that Grok’s dataset must contain CSAM for it to generate CSAM. Surely a combination of nude adults and clothed children would allow for it to synthesize CSAM? (Disclaimer: I’m not in favor of AI in general and definitely n
149.
by hananova 7mo ago
At the point it becomes clear a comment is written by AI it gets filed away as spam. I am not about to go crawling through the slop to find the nugget of stuff you wrote yourself. I do not care to take a guess. If you had a statement to sha
150.
by hananova 7mo ago
I’m pretty sure AI-written comments hold that crown. I have described what bothers me about the writing, and also a proposed solution. Post the prompt, not the slop.

More ›