halfteatree

6 ms·

31.
by halfteatree 9y ago
But that is not even the point -- when facebook invokes the nullification clauses in the patent grant, you're simply back to no patent grant, at all. How is having a patent grant not strictly better? No, I'm not happy with that, b
32.
by halfteatree 9y ago
> A deeply arrogant and ignorant notion. This sentence is quite arrogant in itself. > If you think this was about FUD you really don't understand why people protest React as a core component inside WordPress. Then please explain
33.
by halfteatree 9y ago
As I replied above, this takes you to the same place without a patent grant.
34.
by halfteatree 9y ago
>you can't take action against them if you are using React. Umm, no. You can still sue them, but the patent grant is nullified, which takes you back to the place where no such patent grant exists. Hence, you're strictly better
35.
by halfteatree 9y ago
I don't understand this: how are you not strictly better off with the patent grant? This whole fiasco seems to be nothing but FUD. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14780979 tl;dr: License with no patent g
36.
by halfteatree 9y ago
^ Cynicism at its best.
37.
by halfteatree 9y ago
And now github is using the same license too :)
38.
by halfteatree 9y ago
No, it is not. If you sue people with software patent, I’m happy you lose that ability.
39.
by halfteatree 9y ago
But no one is saying you should use instant messaging or informal communication for everything. It's a tool, and it's good at certain roles, for example, a log that includes context for investigations into incidents. For design do
40.
by halfteatree 9y ago
So... lisp with optional parentheses?