halapro

6 ms·

31.
by halapro 5mo ago
The response should be "you're not a good fit for the company. Collect your stuff."
32.
by halapro 5mo ago
> Unfortunately this doesn't scale Correct. I used to report them, but 3/4 years ago they made it more difficult to report anything because you have to explain what's wrong even when it's very clear.
33.
by halapro 5mo ago
Are these already available? I regularly read these announcements and years later I still don't know where to find them, or are not actually functional.
34.
by halapro 5mo ago
I'm not scolding, I'm explaining what happened. The post uses the word "abuse" for something that was the expected outcome. It's like saying "my motorbike was stolen" when you let the key in the ignition f
35.
by halapro 5mo ago
You told your NS to forward any request to GitHub, a platform you don't own. I think this is the expected outcome. It's good you noticed and shared your findings, but to me this "works as intended"
36.
by halapro 5mo ago
We occasionally get traditional SPAM PRs pointing to their product. In that case it is very useful to clear out title, PR body and reset the commits as well, so none of that appears on the repo. This is time consuming. Unfortunately the PR
37.
by halapro 5mo ago
In the future, when you're looking at past PRs, you'll end up with a list of closed PRs that look legitimate from their titles. You'll waste time opening each one to figure out why it was closed. This is particularly annoying
38.
by halapro 5mo ago
This has two good points: - add "Pull Request requests" that operate like Friend requests. You can't open PRs until you've been whitelisted (temporarily or not) or are proven to be a good OSS citizen (TBD) - add a "
39.
by halapro 5mo ago
If the PR exists on my repo, it's already too late. Either you let me block 6-month old accounts from opening PRs, or you let me delete them. PRs, draft or not, show up in searches and spammers can continue opening new ones as well as
40.
by halapro 5mo ago
This doesn't help with PR spam if that junk still shows up in regular "is:pr" searches. I don’t think unrequested unmerged AI PR spam is useful for compliance, just like deleted comments and issues aren't.
41.
by halapro 5mo ago
They do have ways to limit interactions already, but they work on a whitelist level rather than dynamically based on user "score" (account age, contribution history, etc). If a user gets their comments deleted and blocked from org
42.
by halapro 5mo ago
Who do you add as a contributor though? Wannabe-contributors? Then they appear in the list of contributors before you even see if they're capable of producing an acceptable PR. Your solution would be great if GitHub would also allow
43.
by halapro 5mo ago
You can fork and push all you want. The problem is specifically when you show up in my notifications with your junk PR.
44.
by halapro 5mo ago
Possibly the worst idea I've heard this month. No one, meat or chip, would just set aside $10 "for the opportunity to contribute" This is "let them eat cake" level of out of touchness.
45.
by halapro 5mo ago
[flagged]
46.
by halapro 5mo ago
I'm a big hater of Tailwind but also know that most CSS out there is an absolutely clusterf of outdated rules and !important wars. There's no winning when some dude jumps into the codebase and fixes a bug by adding margin-right to
47.
by halapro 5mo ago
GooBook? Sounds obvious to me. Or just Bookgle. Lap Goog. aiPad. OogleNote. Infinite possibilities.
48.
by halapro 5mo ago
The last time I bit into a nice juicy spicy pepper in the morning, I had to crouch in pain for 5 minutes as I felt stabbed right in the heart. The pepper wasn't even spicy like a bonnet, but I had an empty stomach. So yeah no more pepp
49.
by halapro 5mo ago
I think one of the greatest issues of the last generation of developers is that they never learned about links. They think `div onclick` is equivalent. It pains me that `a` makes up 50% of the HTML acronym but devs don't use it. I bet
50.
by halapro 5mo ago
[flagged]
51.
by halapro 5mo ago
That's news to me https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Bluetoo... Websites cannot use Bluetooth anywhere. The QR codes shown in the blog post are not passkey QR codes, which is lik
52.
by halapro 5mo ago
That's passkey QR codes generated by the browser, it has nothing to do with random QR codes offered by websites.
53.
by halapro 5mo ago
No browser supports Bluetooth.
54.
by halapro 5mo ago
Unless you live in the desert, most likely you can have better local seasonal fruits than apples, you don't need to transport them from across the globe. It's really quite unfortunate because the overabundance of apples and orange
55.
by halapro 5mo ago
I don't understand why the west is so focused on apples. There are thousands of fruits and people just stick to apples, bananas, oranges and grapes. They're not bad, but, like, it's like going to a restaurant and ordering sau
56.
by halapro 5mo ago
The Mac Mini starts at $800 now. How many false information will you include in your comments? https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/mac-mini
57.
by halapro 5mo ago
Really? What does checkout and fast-forward means? This is why people don't like git. Basic operations that have arcane naming.
58.
by halapro 5mo ago
> starts at $599, which is over $1000 in 2005 dollars That's not how money works > Ridiculous You can say all you want and you'll come back to this comment in 2028 when the price is set at +100 or +150.
59.
by halapro 5mo ago
Ok what do you suggest? Every feature ever written should be supported in perpetuity even if 3 people are using it? Clearly you didn't think this through. Should 2026 computers have a ISA interface as well? Supporting old hardware and
60.
by halapro 5mo ago
It's crazy to me that most people don't get it. This is not a "who knows the exact name of this hex color" game, it's " more blue or more green ?" Orange is its own color, but is this hue it 51% red or 5

More ›