hakre

20 ms·

181.
by hakre 5y ago
it was easy: block the user. then it got harder: create one branch that blocked the dependabot branch. then it got harder again: create 00 00 00 - FF FF FF branches (let it run with parallelism and over night). github support is not helpful
182.
by hakre 5y ago
No, and this has been outlined in the past why that is not the case. e.g. https://lwn.net/Articles/61292/ and most likely only one opinion. on the other hand, it would be interesting to learn about what the copyri
183.
by hakre 5y ago
So the corpus has been compiled under license and the derivative work is eligible for distribution?
184.
by hakre 5y ago
a certificate is either valid or its not. this is more for administering it or for users that rely on it and want to know within build systems, at least that is where it did hit me. the failure then, the same. wondered although if there is
185.
by hakre 5y ago
> I'll stand behind that being the single biggest reason that PeerTube simply cannot be a platform to rival YouTube. Well, I would count the greens first and then for rival, a joke. They can never share the love alphabet can share
186.
by hakre 5y ago
It is still likely a derived work. Looks more to me in the example it was just practised the right to make changes to the original work which one could do under the given circumstances which is normally a reciprocal license - floss or else
187.
by hakre 5y ago
You mean when you would have forked before the new licensing became effective?
188.
by hakre 5y ago
They offer, but you don't have to. Only add the uploader that passed your review and use that, not just anything from the interwebs.
189.
by hakre 5y ago
Sure it's your site?
190.
by hakre 5y ago
Also the record of readmes and their date when reviewed would be very insightful.
191.
by hakre 5y ago
And not only such. In the end this is how marketing works, there is always the feeling to be left: the feeling to be part of the in-group.
192.
by hakre 6y ago
Depends on the process. If assigning a license means that there is a review of the dependency before use, this is normally seen.
193.
by hakre 6y ago
Yes, you may confuse me with a different poster, so I can not provide a link for a different person, true. From what I read from the reference in your comment, that law applies to the part which forms the former gdr in germany. According to
194.
by hakre 6y ago
Most likely. It could be the one that a person in power (here the teacher) must expect good faith from the persons underneath him (here the students). Laying out a trap (and given this is true) might show that this is not the case. Mind the
195.
by hakre 6y ago
Nice idea, especially when it's really about learning something. Was it thought that these questions were intentionally without answers?
196.
by hakre 6y ago
yes, as long as the text is binary safe ... . XML specifies the character set for the document. IIRC also for base64.
197.
by hakre 6y ago
Looks like Mozilla still ignores the memo that anti-tracking starts with anti DRM in the first place. Apple your new friend. State of the art data protection looks different. Mozilla ain't asking for help for that thought. How unfortun
198.
by hakre 6y ago
confirmation.
199.
by hakre 6y ago
So if the test is red, it verifies that the users assumptions were wrong first, right? ;)
200.
by hakre 6y ago
as long as binary safe transport is given, possible. unless that ... . you can't skip the memory protocol.
201.
by hakre 6y ago
I think libxml does not have that problem, IIRC golang supports c-bindings.
202.
by hakre 6y ago
It's already possible, albeit but not a full port: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/run-travis-yml The action executes the stage scripts making that part portable at first. It helps a lot migrating as n
203.
by hakre 6y ago
Looks nice, thanks for sharing. For the part to execute the run-script I'm currently going with a github-action itself: https://github.com/marketplace/actions/run-travis-yml it's based on the original tr
204.
by hakre 6y ago
Yes, was warning / log previously, now it throws. So what was a warning and just going on is now an exception that interrupts.
205.
by hakre 6y ago
Which metric? Leaky abstractions is a "Law", not a metric. Are you looking for experience? [ see Wikipedia for contextual meaning of law here, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_(principle) ]
206.
by hakre 6y ago
> What do you think? Have we all been missing something like this in api design? No. It's hard to design, maybe harder to design an API and perhaps a misunderstanding when APIs are designed for others or an API just for an API. As o
207.
by hakre 6y ago
For snapshots use backups. Git is not a backup. For the questions, what's bad with quick help on SO? It's maybe less effective than reading the documentation that ships with git itself but for sure much more popular and less to re
208.
by hakre 6y ago
"Truly understood" is close to a holy church I guess. However it's perhaps really that too many people are thinking they need to use git because their church says so and then have to deal with the self chosen authority.
209.
by hakre 6y ago
Is Apple still offering options that such kind of software could actually be developed by non-apple on _their_ system?
210.
by hakre 6y ago
The licensing requirements of third parties then was the reason you switched to MIT license? Was there a key-moment and would you be okay to share more about it?

More ›