hajile

23 ms·

271.
by hajile 1y ago
> If the rule required bishops to be married then a large chunk of the bishops consecrated by the apostles were not legitimate. Nobody thinks that. Can you point to a bishop appointed by Jesus' 12 disciples who was not married with
272.
by hajile 1y ago
You argued that I was mistranslating. I showed that the etymology and transliteration made a mistranslation effectively impossible. You then completely ignore the evidence to make up an assertion about changing semantics with ZERO proof (ev
273.
by hajile 1y ago
That article is pure sophistry. No actual reasoning why. Just the assertion that "we don't think it makes sense, so it doesn't matter". That's not how holy books are supposed to work. If they really are inspired by
274.
by hajile 1y ago
https://www.etymonline.com/word/bishop > Late Latin episcopus in Spanish became obispo, in Italian vescovo, in Welsh esgob. The Germanic forms include Old Saxon biscop, Old High German biscof. Episkopos literally ch
275.
by hajile 1y ago
That’s an appeal to ignorance. You can look up the Greek yourself (I’ll link a basic translation below). There’s just not much room to mistranslate “one wife”, or “husband”. The official Catholic translation agrees with KJV as does Thomas A
276.
by hajile 1y ago
I’m clearly quoting a large section of the chapter and quoted the entire part before it starts discussing deacons. Paul was an evangelist who preached, converted, then moved on. He wasn’t really a bishop. He also wrote 1 Timothy. You can lo
277.
by hajile 1y ago
The Bible agrees with your musing as it says bishops are to be be married with kids. Peter (who the Catholics claim as the first Pope) was married as the Bible says Jesus healed his mother-in-law. 1 Timothy 3:1-7 [1] This is a true saying,
278.
by hajile 1y ago
> The top 1 percent alone are responsible for one-fifth of warming, not just by using more energy, authors say, but by investing in sectors, like fossil fuels, that are driving up emissions. Investing in fossil fuels makes you responsibl
279.
by hajile 1y ago
You are in the category I mentioned that already know the answer and are using AI to write the code you already understand faster. This is rather different from “vibe coding” in my opinion.
280.
by hajile 1y ago
I’m using it as a pejorative (not an ad hominem) for people who blindly trust unknown code because they don’t have any real understanding. It’s a shortcut for a whole, well-known and obvious argument about the danger of playing with things
281.
by hajile 1y ago
If you don't understand what the copy/paste is actually doing, you shouldn't be script-kiddying it in your project. If you do understand, then the AI is just quickly writing what you already intended. If you are having to und
282.
by hajile 1y ago
This is the learning to fish problem. If you understand git well, a solution isn't very hard (eg, rev-parse each branch and compare to the rev-parse of the current branch and deleting if they match). If you don't understand git we
283.
by hajile 1y ago
Wordpress already killed the low-end of the market a long time ago. 15 years ago, you were setting up wordpress sites and throwing on a simple theme for $500 or so then trying to get them to write up the copy and provide images (or upcharge
284.
by hajile 1y ago
The fact that they could be "vibe coded" means that they (or something similar) probably already existed, but you just didn't know they did.
285.
by hajile 1y ago
You can get Encapsulation, abstraction, and polymorphism any number of other ways. Inheritance is the only defining property of OOP. If you removed all the stuff related to inheritance and trying to fix the leaky abstraction that is objects
286.
by hajile 1y ago
Wrongful conviction rates range from 4% to nearly 16% depending on the study. That means between 1 in 25 and 1 in 6 people convicted of crimes are actually innocent. Is that what you consider a system that works well? Would you get on a pla
287.
by hajile 1y ago
> If we ditched "reasonableness" as a legal concept, even the most basic laws like e.g. the ones about murder would be significantly affected. So what you're proposing is a drastic redesign, and the onus is on you to demon
288.
by hajile 1y ago
> The case consists almost entirely of the testimony of experts and the professionals working on both sides, so I think the judge is actually very familiar with the issues at play here and I'm not sure why you came to the conclusion
289.
by hajile 1y ago
Then we should just eliminate all the laws and instead pass one law that says "don't be evil" and just let the judges/juries make it up as they go. The truth is that you don't believe your own argument. You want LOT
290.
by hajile 1y ago
You didn't read what I wrote and that is apparent in your response. You didn't address any of the facts and instead just blindly parroted back the equivalent of "it's true because they say it's true". If you th
291.
by hajile 1y ago
I'm familiar with what exists -- I simply think it is flawed. I never said SMEs don't testify in civil cases. My contention was that the judge should have consulted SMEs when defining parts of the ruling outside her expertise. You
292.
by hajile 1y ago
Something like reckless endangerment is criminal rather than civil. It will involve subject matter experts (SMEs) presenting both sides. It will involve a jury of peers with various perspectives rather than just the Judge's perspective
293.
by hajile 1y ago
I know the current interpretation, but I also know that it's not logically sustainable. The key here is "reasonableness", but you can't read a judge's mind, so reasonable only means what a reasonable person would in
294.
by hajile 1y ago
Let's cut to the fundamental argument here. Government should NEVER be allowed to dictate your state of mind and should NEVER be allowed to dictate based on feelings instead of facts. If the judge wanted "reasonable" in that
295.
by hajile 1y ago
Not all phones allow custom ROMs and most that do completely void your warranty. Doing it yourself is a complete non-starter for at least 95% of the population.
296.
by hajile 1y ago
Malicious compliance is only illegal if it doesn't actually comply.
297.
by hajile 1y ago
In practical terms, you can't without switching to another company with an android variant that is just as bad.
298.
by hajile 1y ago
Unless the judge actually specified the type of language to be used, this seems completely compliant. Are they supposed to say "Please use our competitor. You'll find your experience with them far superior to what we provide"
299.
by hajile 1y ago
Get a list of all democrats in office then highlight the ones who changed party. The number that switched were a small minority. Wikipedia lists less than 70 and most of those were state rather than federal. Compared to the thousands of sta
300.
by hajile 1y ago
Isn't Ocaml's module system based on StandardML? SML predates Ocaml by a few years and non-standardized ML by a couple decades.

More ›