hagreet

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by hagreet 8y ago

   Welcome to 2018. This is so sad I am exploding out both ends.
2. 32.▲
   by hagreet 8y ago

   "As long as a key is available, a substitution cipher is a safe, simple way to encrypt a message." ...quality article
3. 33.▲
   by hagreet 8y ago

   Unavailable in most European countries. #GDPRproductivity
4. 34.▲
   by hagreet 9y ago

   I don't see the benefits of these. Just because I can manually encrypt and decrypt I don't have more confidence in the cipher. If I already trust the cipher I might as well trust a program that does the encryption and decryption.
5. 35.▲
   by hagreet 9y ago

   Not sure what your point is. You think it should be possible to run the simulation at increased speed?
6. 36.▲
   by hagreet 9y ago

   So essentially you need a trusted third party and if that party stops being trustworthy you have to start from scratch?
7. 37.▲
   by hagreet 9y ago

   So if there is no proof of work how do you avoid forks? The author says something about splits being detectable but that doesn't really help us decide on which side of the split is correct.