hackideiomat

7 ms·

31.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
They are still one of the very best
32.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
No. This is done by a company without a real security team. Compare that to Google, with one of the best security teams in the world.
33.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
But they are still based on chromium lol
34.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
pass a URL! su desktopuser firefox about:blank
35.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Its FF specific as in, in chromium you do not need to install them as its a native feature
36.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
what's up with the title?
37.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Tidal (spotify competitor) takes 2 euro and gives 'em to the artist you've listened to the most. But the rest of the money is probably all going to the big ones as you explained. Just saying this because it is so weird. Like, hell
38.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Google can not stop funding Firefox
39.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
But rather FF than chromium based stuff :)
40.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
And avoiding facebooks SDKs and whatever is ultra hard
41.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
The amazon thing bugs me, as someone with a custom domain :D I literally get 1 or 2 * in my name and the rest is public knowledge due to this
42.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
if anyone does not do this yet and wants an easy solution: Firefox Relay
43.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Who cares if you hash it, cracking a hash of an e-mail is easy AF compared to passwords. Especially on agency scale... How do you hash it? Argon2 or rather some extremely fast to crack hash?
44.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
I guess, if the crypto is real, the only things feds could do is tell tuta to load different JS for certain IPs. Which would not be easy to verify as anyone but a targeted person. The point here is, if they have nothing to hide, they can ea
45.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
worst privacy take ever
46.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
> "This would completely contradict our mission as a privacy protection organization." no shit, but the claim is that you aren't...
47.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
I only use the azure API and did not notice anything
48.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
They do, sometimes, yes. But,most of them seem to be corrupt, fat and merely running after foreigners to tackle them if you wanna call that exercise.
49.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Is choosing 1 of 2 parties reaaaally democratic?
50.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Do not use their app, then set ad block rules to block whatever you want.
51.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
it's not?
52.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
oh no an open redirect... anyways...
53.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
But I can use the car and it's not like Toyota can make the same car for way less... oh and less people died in the process, maybe
54.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
It's good for taxes here to be married officially
55.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Have you ever used a summary service? Have you ever build or even done something with ChatGPT or competitors? There's tons of real world uses and you're falling behind if you think there aint.
56.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Random ads? Why that? Why not contextual ads? E.g., if I'm on a facebook page for programming, maybe show everyone there ads for that new keyboard etc. This is without tracking THE USER, it just has to track where you are. Same for web
57.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
this joke could only be made once, and you did it gz
58.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Proton does proper email crypto that works with other providers (normal PGP) and tuta does their own thing (not saying Proto is good tho, it's still a horrible web UI and comes with its risks)
59.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
Tuta is just weird. It's not really email, it's more like an encrypted chat. If you send a "mail" to someone who does not have tuta, guess what, they are invited to tuta xD
60.
by hackideiomat 3y ago
I'm willing to bet people with a 4 day week need their health insurance way less. (on average)

More ›