hackcasual

96 ms·

451.
by hackcasual 12y ago
I believe realloc must return the same memory spot if the size (and maybe type?) didn't change.
452.
by hackcasual 12y ago
There's more discussion about this on this reddit thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/x1ql4/undefined... The problem is that realloc builtin's return type is internally flagged
453.
by hackcasual 12y ago
Followed shortly by: None of these companies uses traditional product management or textbook “Agile” methods Nope! Does the author think Agile is done company wide?
454.
by hackcasual 12y ago
Found this in their blog post on Google's OpenPGP plugin support: "…is so easy to install and use that anyone, regardless of technical sophistication or ability can use. There is no need to understand PGP or exchange keys with t
455.
by hackcasual 12y ago
They say how they've attacked the problem. And its as stupid as you would imagine: https://www.virtru.com/how-virtru-works I'm guessing the system works by sending the encrypted item out-of-band. Revocation could
456.
by hackcasual 12y ago
There's enough in their service description to not trust them. The way the system is described, you encrypt a file on your device, upload both the key and the file to the cloud, then the receiver downloads both the file and the key. Lo
457.
by hackcasual 12y ago
It's not AC because the flow of current doesn't reverse direction. It's pulsed on/off. The last stage isn't rectification, it's an LC circuit to smooth out the resulting voltage. The reason higher frequency swi
458.
by hackcasual 12y ago
How much lag do you get before the head movements are picked up by the camera?
459.
by hackcasual 12y ago
Ex-amazonian here, It really depends on the team. There's 2 types of crappy places to be at Amazon: the really important legacy system, or the we need to catch up with the competition product. In the first case, there's no opportu
460.
by hackcasual 12y ago
For the record DH key sizes are smaller than RSA keys of the same strength based on our current understanding of the computational effort involved in attacking them. DH-256 should be considered on the verge of too small. 340 or 512 will be
461.
by hackcasual 13y ago
The IPC implementation is Binder, and I believe the overhead, even in the G1 days was microseconds.
462.
by hackcasual 13y ago
They call that out as taking half as long. My guess is they calculated the charge time using 1A but the voltage from the output (17v?)
463.
by hackcasual 13y ago
I suspect the 100% charging time was miscalculated. USB power is 5volts, so a 1A charger meants 5W of continuous power. Battery charging, especially past 85% is not very efficient, so I suspect total charging time will be more in the neighb
464.
by hackcasual 13y ago
From my reading of the issue it seems that he's complaining about a limitation of the tool Linguist. There's a suggested fix that doesn't, as far as I can tell, involve changing how Inferno code is written. My understanding i