Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
habinero
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
21 ms
·
481.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
They never investigated them in the first place, my guy. Law enforcement can't manage to solve half of the murder cases in the country, let alone anything less dire. I don't think you realize how little policing the police actua
482.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
There's nothing anyone can say to change your mind, and that's incredibly sad.
483.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
There's nothing anyone can say to convince you, and that's sad.
484.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
None of that is true, my dude. Don't fall for that victim mentality.
485.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
> And even pro-choice people don't touch philosophical examination of "abortion for no reason except that the mother doesn't want to have and raise the baby." Huh? This is discussed all the time.
486.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
No. They are, again, correct. A chaotic system in physics means "a tiny difference in initial conditions leads to large differences in outcome". You cannot measure precisely enough to make a chaotic system predictable, even if t
487.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Hahahaha. The cops regularly shoot dogs and refuse to save kids. The day they worry about being "crucified" for literally any behavior at all will be a day to celebrate.
488.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Yes. Anyone can be gotten with the right bait. Most people are never targeted and there's a lot of things that mitigate spray-n-pray attacks, but when it comes down to it, human cognition just has some fundamental exploitable weaknesse
489.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
No. They're correct and you are not. Nothing to do with "inability to think of possibilities", it's impossible because of literal physics. It's like saying perpetual motion machines could exist if we just think outs
490.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
> It used to be that many couples could survive on a single income Historically, this is not true - women have always taken in work. Living on someone else's dime was for the wealthy only. The post-war years were a historical anomal
491.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
> I've never understood why women are so eager to go work You're romanticizing it, that's why. Staying at home and not working makes you incredibly vulnerable. You're entirely reliant on the goodwill of someone else,
492.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Those are nice feelings _you_ have, but they don't have anything to do with women being forced into childcare. You're romanticizing things you never had to do.
493.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Yeah. That's how society works lol. I'm perfectly fine with the idea that people with morally reprehensible views are shamed and ostracized for it. Notice he didn't even say what his views were, because he knew he would get n
494.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Experience. You learn to ignore what people _believe_ it does and what they _say_ does and look at what it _actually_ does. It's fun to play with, but LLMs can't reason and are fundamentally unreliable. They cannot be made reliabl
495.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
You're too in love with your own conclusion here. The reality is Elon's kind of an idiot who just impulsively does stuff and mostly gets away with it because money. Elon talked shit online and then fought hard to wriggle out of bu
496.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
No, a bank is regulated and insured and we have a lot of experience handling banks that go insolvent or otherwise fail. Stablecoins are three raccoons in a trenchcoat who pinky promise you can trust them.
497.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
This sentence: > Why not extend that trust to granting people more freedom in how they use their funds? followed immediately by: > If I want a large loan from my bank with absolutely zero irony is very funny.
498.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Revenue minus compute is not profit lol. You still have to pay salaries and rent on your buildings, which are usually the biggest expenses.
499.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
I don't think spyware sold by ex-Mossad that relies on expensive and easily burned 0-days count as "Apple rolls over for LEO" lol
500.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
As I said, the government did ask them to do that. Apple refused and then rearchitected their hardware so they couldn't even if they wanted to. And no, Apple bakes in immutable encryption during chip fabrication. They literally canno
501.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Yeah, I know. It requires expensive 0-days, which are rare and very much not what the other guy was implying, which is "Apple unlocks things for LEO". Both Google and Apple have world-class security teams, it's not surprisi
502.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Yes, it's called phishing.
503.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Nothing to do with legal responsibility and it's not about only consumers. I have 50 terabytes of data breaches on a NAS with lots of plain text or badly encrypted passwords, and that's just a small subset of what's out there
504.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
It's not really spin. He's the wallet, not the talent.
505.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
I mean, you can just look it up instead of spreading conspiracies. Apple put in functionality that makes it impossible for them to unlock phones and added additional controls to make brute forcing infeasible. The fight was fought, they had
506.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
AIs don't actually use any of the generated "reasoning" they can spit out. If you find the word soup has spelled out something helpful, fine, but it has nothing to do with anything.
507.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Eh, not really. He managed to hire people who can manage him well enough to get him out of the way.
508.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
"The workers only suffer if the owners deliberately act against their own interest" is "the workers will suffer" with more words tacked on the end.
509.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
"Companies" aren't going to suffer. Their workers and vendors will, and the whole thing cascades.
510.
▲
by
habinero
1y ago
Putting aside the idea that American companies can hold their own and China doesn't pay the tariffs, it really wasn't necessary to tank the entire economy and kick off a depression to do this. I guess they can't steal IP if
More ›