h1d

73 ms·

841.
by h1d 8y ago
How hard is it to create a user for each of the system admins? It seems it's not a good practice to share a single account as it makes it hard to tell who did what.
842.
by h1d 8y ago
Using bash never prevented the problem in the first place.
843.
by h1d 8y ago
Why can you not modify the editor environment that you use often? Hard to see I need to deal with environments where I can do nothing but keep the default every time I use it. Once you get the speed that is tuned to your liking, the default
844.
by h1d 8y ago
Great read, thanks.
845.
by h1d 8y ago
If you're convinced your productivity may change by ditching bash, I'm not sure what kind of counterargument the sysadmin will bring.
846.
by h1d 8y ago
So, you'd rather use something that is decades old because you can't/don't want to (ask to) install 1 new program on the server and take a weekend to rebuild your config file? You can simply import aliases as is and in s
847.
by h1d 8y ago
Any reason being said or any guesses to the reasons?
848.
by h1d 8y ago
What kind of experience do you have to say that? (Just asking)
849.
by h1d 8y ago
And how many on the system that you actually touch? How hard is it to (ask to) install a new shell? Obviously if you're distributing your script publicly no one would write that in zsh compatible way.
850.
by h1d 8y ago
fish forces you to use braces. (Even without the dollar sign.)
851.
by h1d 8y ago
How many people need that portability? Most of the shell scripts are quick work that needs to run on small amount of environments.
852.
by h1d 8y ago
I keep seeing this statement but this absolutely does not apply to everybody. How often can you just install fish or use other programming language instead of being forced to use bash? It's sad people keep using the default just becaus
853.
by h1d 8y ago
Absolutely agree. As fish site (jokingly) states, it was for the 90's, perhaps it's time we want one for the 20's next.
854.
by h1d 8y ago
It's time we need a better shell than bash instead of thinking it's great after bleeding with it for years and gets used to it.
855.
by h1d 8y ago
What's painful about Python but not so for others? Writing anything complicated in bash/zsh is painful enough I wouldn't even think about it.
856.
by h1d 8y ago
I think it's time people start using something better than bash/zsh that is decades old, like fish or even come up with a more modern shell. Even by looking at these examples, you see it has less verbosity like "then" an
857.
by h1d 8y ago
What is the reason that you want to switch?
858.
by h1d 8y ago
Wow, peco is so convenient, now I don't have to keep trying to grep every possibilities.
859.
by h1d 8y ago
Perhaps you want new tabs for your shell instead of typing 'fg' every so often.
860.
by h1d 8y ago
Maybe try Jetbrain's product and see what you may be missing from stock installs of text editors?
861.
by h1d 8y ago
Not sure if you missed the official installation doc for Discourse but it recommends you to install via docker and with it, it's a 10 minute work. Not sure how faster can it be.
862.
by h1d 8y ago
Do note that it depends on the subscription model. If they give you a perpetual license when terminating the subscription, it would be good but if they won't let you use it, they just get paid by locking you up with less motivation to
863.
by h1d 8y ago
Content subscription depends. I would rather just rent the few that matters and feel I got a better deal than watching 5 average ones missing out the one that looked the most interesting.
864.
by h1d 8y ago
What can you tell from the line?
865.
by h1d 8y ago
My experience with SSHGuard was it treated monitoring events (specifically from monit) as failed attempts and blocked further attempts marking the service as unreachable. I'm sure this can be configured but fail2ban does not block such
866.
by h1d 8y ago
Really, this sounds like a bad practice to bind on non privileged port. A user can keep running a program to check if your non privileged port can be bound and if it could, it can start any behaving daemon that could be pretending to be a v
867.
by h1d 9y ago
Should've at least said "easily". Just looks like it's capable of doing that which doesn't take much attention.
868.
by h1d 9y ago
For me, the reason was, why add an extra layer when there isn't much of a reason to do so. All packages are at least tested on npm.
869.
by h1d 9y ago
Not sure how exactly Google works but if you just block versioned pages out, won't they just not show up instead of somehow pulling the latest static URL in the same ranked position? Maybe better to specify canonical URL as the latest
870.
by h1d 9y ago
Really... One quick google and you realize there's another bundler of the same name. Can the author rename it to save them both for googlability?

More ›