gugagore

93 ms·

931.
by gugagore 10y ago
Do you think written Standard English is less ambiguous than any other English, or written language? Because I don't see why that would be the case.
932.
by gugagore 10y ago
Yes! Here's an example: http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06520
933.
by gugagore 10y ago
You are only talking about supervised learning. And the bias people are probably talking about is bias in the data, not bias in the "input", as you put it. See http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06520 for a counterex
934.
by gugagore 10y ago
Do you know what ever happened to the Encoder? I used to be so excited as a kid when a new issue came out.
935.
by gugagore 10y ago
"music is waves and frequency" in the same way that "spoken language is waves and frequency"---not very usefully. I think bringing in" appreciation" muddies the waters.
936.
by gugagore 10y ago
"Live their lives". Sounds like an exaggeration for something as inconsequential (as you suggest) as pronouns.
937.
by gugagore 10y ago
No, this is not what people mean when they say "Fourier series" which is something like "the Fourier series expansion of a periodic function". It's not about whether the values are continuous or discrete, but instea
938.
by gugagore 10y ago
I understand you might find this cliche cute, but it's actually not even cute. Gay men challenge what it means to be a "man", that's what can make people uncomfortable.
939.
by gugagore 10y ago
I think perhaps you are not familiar with prior art in the area.
940.
by gugagore 10y ago
French is a particularly poor example to choose. ASL has been continuously delegitimized as a language. Up until the 60s no one thought ASL was a "real" language, or a language as rich as English, because no one was studying the g
941.
by gugagore 10y ago
This project has been bothering me for (what feels like) months and I am glad to see there was an official response by the linguistics department of UW. How'd you find it? By politics, do you mean that the letter mentions the social is
942.
by gugagore 10y ago
Interesting. I'll ask around about that. However, I think it's fair to say that a rudimentary system like this one is scripted, and is not tuned to the informal and complicated contexts you describe. You can argue that it's f
943.
by gugagore 10y ago
I'm not sure how close you are to working with RL/ML, possibly more than me! However, I don't think you it is useful to talk about the state of the field so broadly. If you say "supervised learning is well understood&quo
944.
by gugagore 10y ago
Can you describe why/how this would be used instead of the dictionary sign for THANKS or GOOD?
945.
by gugagore 10y ago
Yes it matters. I didn't say anything about a standard. I don't mean that "there isn't an agreed upon notation that Deaf Americans use to write ASL", I mean "we don't have a good way represent signs that a
946.
by gugagore 10y ago
Have you seen that, or are you speculating?
947.
by gugagore 10y ago
It's not really clear what it means to transcribe the signs anyway. There isn't very great notation for signed languages
948.
by gugagore 10y ago
Actually, the distinction (that I've seen) between "translator" and "interpreter" is whether the "transformation" is happening in real-time across spoken/sign language, or whether it's written la
949.
by gugagore 10y ago
Did you watch the corresponding video
950.
by gugagore 10y ago
I don't think I understand the rest of your comment, but I don't agree that "RL is well understood".
951.
by gugagore 11y ago
What about Julia? http://docs.julialang.org/en/release-0.4/manual/methods/
952.
by gugagore 11y ago
It could be worth mentioning that, for thinning points, ideally you'd use a circle, so that points are thinned equally in all directions. When you use a square, diagonal lines are thinned more (by a factor of sqrt(2)) than horizontal&#
953.
by gugagore 11y ago
fyi(q), I doesn't stand for intensity, but for in-phase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-phase_and_quadrature_compon...
954.
by gugagore 11y ago
I think that is true, but as you say that's the most recent model.
955.
by gugagore 11y ago
I agree with you. But Roomba.
956.
by gugagore 11y ago
If you are talking about phonological categories, then you are almost certainly correct. However, somewhere between choosing to produce certain phonemes and the actual sounds you produce, there's some process (maybe just the physics of
957.
by gugagore 11y ago
How does it remove the benefit of not worrying about formatting?
958.
by gugagore 11y ago
I don't know where this thinking gets us. My computer, once I disconnect it from the internet, is actually a finite state machine and not a Turing machine, which I think you acknowledge. How does that help with anything? If my program
959.
by gugagore 11y ago
> So the progress we've made in the United States through laws and regulations regarding race and gender is a lie then? It's a very misleading sort of progress. It helps many people believe that we're post-racial and that
960.
by gugagore 11y ago
Have you calibrated your flashlight to emit non-ionizing radiation?

More ›