Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gugagore
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
331.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
This is really not good safety culture. I'm sure it's not the same experience when a pilot practices emergency procedures in a simulator vs in a real emergency, but it's still helpful. Your point is maybe that the simulation
332.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
But what previous thing is most analogous to batteries on cars? Cellphones and hoverboards are so much tinier. Maybe this isn't the same issue specifically, and some scale of government can require a tax to fund e.g. more education or
333.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
For the record, I wasn't trying to correct the author as much as I wanted to share an observation that I find interesting about this example.
334.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
Can you think of a representation where they would be isomorphic?
335.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
But they're not identical up to isomorphism. That's the point of my comment. You cannot round-trip (r = Inf, theta = .123) to a cartesian representation and back.
336.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
> There absolutely are children who are "blue" or "red". There aren't a lot, but they are there. [...] The analogy isn't perfect It is perfect. Color, as you're using it, is a phenomenon of human perce
337.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
> It's flowery language. Some people are dumb, some people are geniuses, and most people are just mediocre. It's not fair, but that is the way life is. What you are dismissing as "flowery language" appears to be a dif
338.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
> In a closed world, these [polar and cartesian] are identical representations. They are not identical! To even think for a moment that they are identical, you must have something like floating point numbers in mind to back x, y, r, thet
339.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
> Anybody who has been through education has observed that there are the people who "get it" and the people who struggle. I've been through education, and my take-away is that it's quite a bit more nuanced than that d
340.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
I think it's more interesting not to take for granted that this grouping (often called "tracking" in K-12) makes obvious sense. http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/108013/chapters/What-.
341.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
What about on the other end? Why not have each hex digit be a directory along a path? Then you have very, very few files per directory at the cost of deeper hierarchy. What's the practical downside?
342.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
Thanks. And so in 1NF, would you ever have a column of type boolean?
343.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
It's no big secret that different social groups exhibit language variation, and that while there's nothing inherently lesser about certain dialects, they are nonetheless coded as e.g low or high status. You might feel a lot more c
344.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
I've skimmed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization before and I'm trying to reconcile your clear explanation with what is there. > Informally, a relational database relation is often des
345.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
You could require the caller to keep an opaque handle, and have all the state encapsulated on that handle. The caller won't know if this state is messy or not, and I think this does a good job of encapsulating annoying complexity. But
346.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
> you can define _1 and _2 as lenses for accessing the first and second element respectively of a tuple: _1 :: Lens' (a,b) a _2 :: Lens' (a,b) b From the looks of it, this is to access the first and second element
347.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
Sorry, I don't have a good introduction to recommend, I just wanted to include a link if anyone is intrigued by "scientific types", which refers specifically to: https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/S
348.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
Interval arithmetic certainly has its place. However, you don't find it used more often because a naive implementation results in intervals that are often uselessly huge. Consider x in [-1, 1], and y in [-1, 1]. x*y is also in [-1,1],
349.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
I think you mean to say "fully connected" in place of "feed-forward" when trying to draw a distinction with respect to "convolutional".
350.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
I think your question is important, and I wish you had received a reply. I think it's common for people's needs to be in conflict; everything is a trade-off, as you acknowledged. But I think you baked into your question a false di
351.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
I didn't realize you can do string concatenation with + .
352.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
Yeah. That's unfortunate. The discussion on totality makes clear that it subsumes reflexivity when a = b. The diagram, which indicates implication, is also not consistent with the logical statement, which indicates iff.
353.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
> But for two events that are separated by a distance than light can't travel in the time by which they are separated As written, this sounds circular to me. How do the know how far apart in time the two events are?
354.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
Humans can't hear a phase difference.
355.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
Why are the next 5 years going to be different than the last 50?
356.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
This article would resonate with me almost entirely if not for this part: > Here’s the thing — the world right now, despite all its problems, nastiness and tragedy, is far better than it was a hundred years ago. The world a hundred year
357.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
I believe you're thinking of https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/metaprogramming/#Gen... (but I don't find it helpful to compare to fexprs, which I think of as more about deferring evaluati
358.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
There are other tests that qualify you for membership, it appears.
359.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
> No one will ever implement this thing, and no one believes it actually brings us closer to an actual solution to the exponent 2 conjecture. It brings us closer more than anything I've done, that's for sure. I agree with your
360.
▲
by
gugagore
6y ago
I want to clarify that your first sentence likely means something like "O notation is insensitive to hardware in the way you're suggesting." Not "you can't apply O notation GPUs"
More ›