Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gspr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
54 ms
·
721.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
And while reading: do! And when doing (solving a problem): don't read (the answer)!
722.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Do you struggle with mathematical reasoning in itself, or with different aspects of mathematics (aspects that are built on, and work based on, said reasoning)?
723.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Oh I agree with that.
724.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Of course. But the fact that the norm is that one doesn't have to worry about these things still is a huge improvement.
725.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Pass, the piece of software that, per line of code it possesses, has improved my digital life more than any other. A true gem!
726.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> Let's not forget the ridiculous pay for the executives which has been shown to not correlate with revenue (or anything else) I may be a naive person who generally detests the organization chart gymnasts, but I honestly believe Moz
727.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
But its orbit isn't perfect or perfectly stable: Other forces than just the Sun-Earth system act on it, albeit very weakly. Some include photonic pressure (photons from the sun pushing on one side, not the other), the moon, a few scatt
728.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Most certainly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point#Solar_System_va... I don't think I understand your question about the sun. The Lagrange point used for JWST is an Earth-Sun one.
729.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Doesn't work with crimes, for instance. Or with poor performance of the company – the shareholders sure won't throw up their hands and say "oh well, we can't figure out why we're not seeing any returns, so we'l
730.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Sure. But the buck stops with the corporation's board, or with the CEO that they appoint. And corporations aren't free to break the law, even though that diffusion of liability should be at play in that case, too.
731.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> Expecting moral courage from a big corporation is probably an exercise in inevitable disappointment though. I agree about the fact that it is. But why do we accept that? Corporations are made up of people. We certainly do expect people
732.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
The photos are definitely taken at very different times: #23 has flowers in the grass that remind me of summer. #27 has bare trees that say winter or late fall/early spring (and the lack of leaves or snow on the ground snow and relativ
733.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> In the common case, as they exist today, with current popular NFT projects, possession is generally sufficient to prove ownership. You're skipping something important: ownership of what exactly?
734.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> I don't understand what point you're trying to make. We can already enforce these existing property rights on digital assets I guess that's exactly their point: We have this. What the hell are NFTs supposed to bring to t
735.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
I think that's what the cryptocurrency/NFT folks are dreaming about: a society in which there are no official services (no official money, no officially sanctioned notaries, etc.), so that you'll instead have an every-man-for
736.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Are you hinting at the fact that we're missing a giant ledger in which the paper is documented as being Really Really The Really Most Real And Authentic Paper? Since that ledger isn't rooted in anything else than a bunch of people
737.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Ah, my bad. Thanks!
738.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> - On the low level more generic tooling I use ALGPL, so a mix of AGLP and LGPL, you can think of it as LGPL but you cannot modify it without sharing the source if you make money off of hosting a service which uses the software (Amazon
739.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> Except that Star Trek is a TV show. A category in which it loses handily to Babylon 5, the best sci-fi show, nay, the best show in general, ever to have been made.
740.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> For the legitimate user, its easier to tell them to rent a $5/month VPS. Quite often blocked, too.
741.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
And entirely voluntary service, surely.
742.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Take over home directories?!
743.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
How? By enacting the will of an authoritarian majority, of course.
744.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Vile.
745.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> if you want people to actually start using this (and it seems like you do) they're not going to be happy if students end up closing their browsers in the middle of quizzes because they aren't in on the jokes. When did the wo
746.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
> I believe that people don't really have the power to make systemic changes in US, either. The past 10 years or so of federal politics have been ample demonstration of that. I'm inclined to agree. > But I digress. Mozilla i
747.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
It is, at least for me, not at all clear that that's possible to do in a good way within the expressive power of any mainstream language. And "good" in this case of Rust would include "without runtime overhead that could
748.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
And that is understandable. But how does one leap from this fact to excusing a non-profit in a country without the underlying problem doing the same?
749.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
Then I'd argue it's bad systemic change.
750.
▲
by
gspr
5y ago
I really do sympathize with people living under corrupt regimes. And I sympathize with them having to use a metal pipe to whack someone in the head to survive. Does that mean that non-profits should start embracing head-whacking?
More ›