gslepak

6 ms·

31.
Alleged Fable sabotage of an ML project(xcancel.com)
2 points by gslepak 4mo ago|0 comments
32.
by gslepak 4mo ago
> We’ve therefore launched the model with safeguards that mean queries on some topics will instead receive a response from our next-most-capable model, Claude Opus 4.8. Genius way to double the price on Opus 4.8!
33.
by gslepak 4mo ago
They want to scan your soul. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v5HLLkgo5A
34.
by gslepak 4mo ago
Here's the previous list: https://americanhumanist.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Fait...
35.
by gslepak 4mo ago
Would be cool if this were an open model.
36.
by gslepak 4mo ago
Awesome! Now how do we use this? I tried selecting text and seeing if there was a "Speak" menu item but there doesn't seem to be.
37.
by gslepak 5mo ago
It's poor form to publish exploits like this but Microsoft not paying their bounty is also poor form, and so is attempting to exploit the legal system to defend Microsoft's "right" to write buggy code.
38.
by gslepak 5mo ago
On page 102 of the system card [1] I'm pleased to see evaluation against "creative mastery". In our work we asked several frontier AIs to come up with an API we needed. We compared Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 (among others). Opus 4.
39.
Instead of LLMs we need self-updating SLMs(crib.social)
1 points by gslepak 5mo ago|0 comments
40.
by gslepak 5mo ago
> Do not trust analysis written in the issue. Independently verify behavior and derive your own analysis from the code and execution path. Human is asking the machine to do what the human themselves refuses to do, while calling it a cl
41.
by gslepak 5mo ago
> In hindsight with all the npm supply chain attacks Ryan was probably right about all of these things "Probably"? Are you saying there's a chance he wasn't right? I really think Ryan deserves a lot more credit than
42.
by gslepak 5mo ago
> The non-hallucination rate in AA-omniscience is SOTA Note that a perfect "non-hallucination rate" is rather meaningless as such tests can contain human hallucinations. It means the model aligns with the possibly-true, possibl
43.
Big Tech's AI Trap(crib.social)
2 points by gslepak 5mo ago|0 comments
44.
by gslepak 5mo ago
Does this support any language or is it limited to a specific set of languages?
45.
Where do we think we're going with proprietary AI?(crib.social)
1 points by gslepak 5mo ago|0 comments
46.
AI Hype vs. AI Reality(fixingtao.com)
2 points by gslepak 5mo ago|1 comments
47.
Show HN: Dez brings back Zed's Text Threads(github.com)
1 points by gslepak 5mo ago|0 comments
48.
by gslepak 5mo ago
> Ghostbox is not reselling or reoffering GitHub’s service. It is a CLI that helps a person create and connect to workflows in their own GitHub account, using their own Actions minutes, for software development work. You are not advertis
49.
by gslepak 5mo ago
You are in direct violation of their Acceptable Use Policy: https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/acceptable-use-polici... > You will not reproduce, duplicate, copy, sell, resell or exploit any portion of the
50.
by gslepak 5mo ago
You're not running a charity. You're probably violating their TOS and abusing the good will they're putting out towards open source projects. I can't believe it but your little project has for the first time in my life p
51.
Linux averaging ~350 CVEs per day(crib.social)
4 points by gslepak 5mo ago|0 comments
52.
by gslepak 5mo ago
Much smaller context
53.
by gslepak 6mo ago
> I'll die on the hill of curtailing this stuff in a privacy-preserving way. At some point you'll realize the contradiction in not trusting these "multi-billion-dollar businesses" to the point that you are risking ens
54.
by gslepak 6mo ago
Good: some commenters here realize it's an attack on privacy Bad: some still entertain the idea that we should do age verification using some sort of crypto primitives There is no reason for age verification at all. I am from the goats
55.
by gslepak 6mo ago
I do call openclaw style agents "living agents", although they might be closer to a kind of zombie. Living agents like openclaw et. al. do have a self-modifying property of sorts thanks to their memory, and so that system might be
56.
by gslepak 6mo ago
What is doing the intelligencing though? Is it the LLM or the person training it? To me, that seems awfully close to arguing that a puppet is intelligent because a human is pulling the strings and making it dance. We can agree to disagree o
57.
by gslepak 6mo ago
See the adjacent thread with @altruios.
58.
by gslepak 6mo ago
FWIW there are other definitions of intelligence that are wholly immaterial. Spirits are considered intelligent even though they have no body because they are composed of pure non-physical consciousness. Plants are intelligent even though t
59.
by gslepak 6mo ago
> What you seem to be describing isn't AG(eneral)I, but artificial greater intelligence. If you ignore what I said in answer to you earlier then perhaps it would make sense to draw this conclusion. But if you take the full context o
60.
by gslepak 6mo ago
I can see how that would be implied by my comments so you're right to question that. The principles that are found in the brain are what gives qualification to "AGI", not the brain itself, so it's possible there are othe

More ›