gruez

12 ms·

241.
by gruez 2mo ago
>For Wikipedia, people look up sources to create some original work. They do it while citing the original work but that's not the major point. That's clearly all lawful, you are allowed to do that. >For LLMs, people (or let
242.
by gruez 2mo ago
>The Android kernel source code is in git: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/ That's the mainline kernel. Actual devices use various LTS kernels, for instance the pixel 9a uses kernel 6.1[1],
243.
by gruez 2mo ago
You can compare against old dumps.
244.
by gruez 2mo ago
> There’s a mile of difference between citing a work and taking it, rewording it, and not crediting or compensating the original author. So what's wikipedia doing vs what LLMs do? So far as I can tell the only difference is in citat
245.
by gruez 2mo ago
>You still haven't replied to the point in the original comment about compensating the people who do this work, so I think it's quite obvious that you haven't read it. Issac newton discovers the theory of gravity. He advan
246.
by gruez 2mo ago
>the company just needs to prove that someone, at some point, made a direct modification to the code not through the AI. It only takes one drop of copyright to make it a copyrighted work. Company A: You stole our code >:( Company B: C
247.
by gruez 2mo ago
>And I mean in full: cover for their living expenses; their rent; internet access; materials; everything. Who decides which artists get subsidized? How would larger projects work? Seeing how often open source volunteer projects implode d
248.
by gruez 2mo ago
Like, now with the advent of AI, or even before? You might not have much love for encyclopedias, which were mostly replaced by wikipedia, but the "secondary sources don't get copyright protection" would also cover programming
249.
by gruez 2mo ago
>Please reread the comment you are replying to. I will wait. If you're going to post thinly veiled implications that I didn't read your comment, you should be pretty damn sure that you make it look like you read my comment, w
250.
by gruez 2mo ago
I don't see how "experts" are relevant under OP's framework unless they're did the primary research themselves. Otherwise they're just regurgitating someone else's research. The "oh there's human
251.
by gruez 2mo ago
>The idea that private enterprise leads innovation is propaganda, i.e publicly funded academic study paved the way for LLMs, corps just commodotise ideas to make them viable under capitalism. So if you founded some wildly successful unic
252.
by gruez 2mo ago
>Makes sense to me. AI models are trained on (as large of a subset as possible of) the sum of human knowledge, so their outputs should belong to humanity as a whole. No it doesn't, because that would mean any sort of secondary sourc
253.
by gruez 2mo ago
> I guess, my attack model for my personal phones doesn't really account for "my phone got stolen", I'm far more worried about impersonation and remote phone hijacking than needing to be safe from confiscation from fe
254.
by gruez 2mo ago
You still need to rely on the OEM to properly configure the bootloader, not leak the keys, and provide updated vendor blobs.
255.
by gruez 2mo ago
Here's a post with more specific allegations: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-stand...
256.
by gruez 2mo ago
You can use the same to argue for "paycheck advance ursery", because the alternative to that is borrowing from the mob, or not borrowing anything at all and being thrown on the streets.
257.
by gruez 2mo ago
"Largest producer" != "largest exporter"
258.
by gruez 2mo ago
>The markets generally respond to US concerns by buying more US treasuries. That’s counter-intuitive but reflects the situation that if things hit the fan they feel loaning the US money is still the safest place for their money. I though
259.
by gruez 2mo ago
>Good point, the American labs have an awful reputation ... Reddit/bluesky users seething at anthropic/openai doesn't matter, because they're not the one making the purchasing decisions for AI. Moreover all the compla
260.
by gruez 2mo ago
For one, openai and anthropic are the top two AI labs and therefore have some reputation at stake. Openrouter is like aliexpress. Any fly-by night vendor can get listed on there.
261.
by gruez 2mo ago
>It's an inflated number due to the AI market, but their selling point is distribution. >Many people and businesses want to experiment with different models, but they don't want to sign up for a dozen different services. Bus
262.
by gruez 2mo ago
>I can see the advantage of Cloudflare's proxy systems, but I wish they'd be clearer about when they're being used and not pretend that this is some DNS feature or that records have been set to one thing when they've
263.
by gruez 2mo ago
Besides the vendor, you can fingerprint the extensions list, as well as various limits https://browserleaks.com/webgl . Also webgl isn't fully deterministic across vendors (similar to audiocontext, which is affected by
264.
by gruez 2mo ago
Should nginx be blamed too, because that also allows site owners to ban tor/VPN users?
265.
by gruez 2mo ago
It works off PoW, so all you need is a vaguely working js/wasm runtime. It won't fail you if it detects you as spoofing user agent, or are running a "weird" browser like servo on freebsd (or whatever). All of this is &qu
266.
by gruez 2mo ago
>It is already painful to browse web sometimes using the non-"standard" tools (that is, not a Chrome with Google account signed in, not an EU/US residential IP). What if tomorrow Cloudflare checks will require attested and
267.
by gruez 2mo ago
>They're more expensive than that, but subsidised by VC capital They're being subsidized? How do you explain their fat margins, $15.4B of profits on $54.0 of revenue? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinduoduo
268.
by gruez 2mo ago
>If there were some change they could enact which improves the "greater good" (whatever that is) at the cost of profit, they wouldn't. Simple as that. Right, nobody thinks airports/airlines are altruistic organization
269.
by gruez 2mo ago
Yeah I'm not sure what's up with all the submissions that have misleading/clickbait titles. Did OP just tell claude to post on HN for them with an "engaging" title?
270.
by gruez 2mo ago
>If that's the case it means that they can show the "Now boarding - remain seated" only to people that will board in economy seats. That's physically not possible if all you have is a single display in front of the ga

More ›