gruez

4 ms·

61.
by gruez 14d ago
I agree with the conclusion, but the whole article is obviously AI slop.
62.
by gruez 14d ago
>LG is contradicting themselves here. In order to detect a wake word then they must be collecting or recording ambient conversations. No, it's arguably accurate because "record" implies it's being persisted. Otherwise
63.
by gruez 14d ago
>also fucks self-checkout. are we so poverty stricken as a society now that we can't afford to pay cashiers? Yeah, I'm appalled how poor as a society we've become, now that we can't afford door men (outside of luxury
64.
by gruez 14d ago
>Sure, but the Waymo is taking intrusive video of much more than the inside of the car. The alternative is having a driver in the car, which is equally intrusive.
65.
by gruez 14d ago
1. there's still personal cars. 2. this is hardly a waymo/autonomous car/big tech thing. covid came with "vaccine passports" in some jurisdictions. there's no reason why it couldn't be enforced by human ta
66.
by gruez 14d ago
>it's hard to argue they were unaware of the risk. So what does it mean for an owner of a german sheppard, who specifically got it because they want a ferocious dog that can bite intruders, then it turned out it bit the mailman? Sho
67.
by gruez 14d ago
>I don't think you or I would get the same leniency if a bot on our network did the same. Well yeah, because if you coded a bot, realistically the two options are: 1) bot that crawls random sites/computers 2) bot that crawls ra
68.
by gruez 14d ago
Because "attack" implies intent. Accidentally break a window? You might be on the hook to fix it, but you're not going to jail. Break the same window at 3am, while carrying a duffel bag and other burglary tools? Well that&#x2
69.
by gruez 14d ago
Right, because in that case you'd have a hard time convincing the court that the access wasn't intentional. You might not know the law existed, but you intended to access the system. You'd have a pretty solid defense if you r
70.
by gruez 14d ago
Yes, that's actually how it works: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_rea
71.
by gruez 14d ago
You read your own source? >having knowingly accessed [...] >intentionally accesses a computer without authorization [...]
72.
by gruez 14d ago
No harm, no foul. Dog owners are on the hook for damages resulting from their dogs, but there must be some damage in the first place. If the dog gets loose and goes in your fenced backyard, disregarding your "no trespassing" sign,
73.
by gruez 14d ago
And...? The CPI is a weighted basket. Gas costing 2x (or whatever) doesn't mean CPI is 2x. Is that hard of a concept to grasp?
74.
by gruez 14d ago
Calling them a "hyperscaler" is a stretch. By all accounts it's some renewables startup that's trying to pivot into AI because obviously AI = $$$, and calling themselves a "hyperscaler" in the process. Calling
75.
by gruez 14d ago
Because the major labs are stenographically marking their text outputs, similar to how image outputs are already wateremarked.
76.
by gruez 14d ago
>the reported CPI of 2.4%, which of course is nowhere near the actual increase in life's necessities but does show that you can get TVs cheap I went through the CPI basket[1] and vaguely looked for categories "life's neces
77.
by gruez 14d ago
>also why hyperscalers are paying folks to host gpu clusters in their homes Source? There's definitely shady people paying people to host proxies, but hyperscalers doing it would be surprising.
78.
by gruez 15d ago
"mfg"? They don't manufacture anything.
79.
by gruez 15d ago
>Changing jobs can be rough or maybe even impossible in this job market. Wasn't there a 6 month severance on offer?
80.
by gruez 15d ago
>This was the desired effect though, as higher oil prices means more profit for US based oil producers. I'm sure that will trickle down any time now. That's giving the Trump administration too much credit. Before the war there
81.
by gruez 15d ago
Yeah, what even is the point of a "chronometer" (you don't have a clock elsewhere?), "data stream" (???), "radar visualization" (???), "depth field" (???)
82.
by gruez 15d ago
Original reddit post, since TFA didn't even bother linking to it: https://www.reddit.com/r/GalaxyFold/comments/1wcacld/tried_t...
83.
by gruez 16d ago
Cognition, the same company that a few years ago demoed a coding bot purporting to be able to autonomously complete upwork tasks, but upon closer inspection was going off the rails and not even completing what was asked? https://
84.
by gruez 17d ago
It changes the economics of the attack because it requires the attacker to do compute before they can make requests. Depending on how good the fingerprinting is, it can also get very expensive (eg. requiring you to run a full browser, rathe
85.
by gruez 17d ago
Just like people complaining about "phablets" a decade ago right? "more bulky than a phone, smaller than a tablet"?
86.
by gruez 17d ago
>Perhaps it's something like: families that earn enough to have one parent stay at home don't use child care. Therefore children in child care are more likely to be from less affluent families than those who are not in child ca
87.
by gruez 17d ago
>looking at the radio? Current trend nowadays is watching tiktok, though thankfully I've only seen it at red lights, but that might just be because I'm not staring at other drivers when driving around at 40mph.
88.
by gruez 17d ago
Rivian didn't do any preliminary tests with safety drivers, or on a closed course?
89.
by gruez 17d ago
>Yes, he would be banned from driving if he ran over a kid. Realistically no, unless he was hilariously reckless. > SMITH: There’s the case that happened with the little boy on the Upper West Side, Cooper Stock. He and his dad were
90.
by gruez 17d ago
So what does this mean for Timmy (16 years old) learning how to drive? Should that also be banned, lest he runs over some kid? Or does he get a pass because he's a human and not a faceless corporation? Maybe he can repay the favor in 6

More ›