growse

53 ms·

751.
by growse 5y ago
If you can't think of any, do you think that means that those who can't work (disability, illness, dependents) deserve to be poor forever?
752.
by growse 5y ago
I have extensive experience with the NHS (unfortunately) and have pretty much always been very well looked after. The only exception was probably maternity post-delivery, but that's not anything to do with the fact that it was the NHS.
753.
by growse 5y ago
> This. If it were universal, companies could just start charging everyday products much more. Boom, all people getting ubi suddenly need to start working again and they need to pay more in taxes to support all the money going in ubi. Th
754.
by growse 5y ago
> That's where my taxes will go. The welfare state already receives the largest fraction of your taxes. Personally, I'm in favour of things that make the welfare state more cost-effective. > And I have to pay almost a grand
755.
by growse 5y ago
> I use it in Typescript often. Very useful. > type Verb = 'GET' | 'POST' | 'PUT' | 'DELETE'; > export type TerminusType = 'ICAO' | 'IATA' | 'LOCODE' | 'ADD
756.
by growse 5y ago
Joining a group with a URL isn't unique to Telegram. Signal certainly supports it, and I think a few other platforms do too.
757.
by growse 6y ago
Google open-sourced pluscodes, which seems like a decent open alternative: https://maps.google.com/pluscodes/
758.
by growse 6y ago
I think they're more wondering why two separate users are posting nearly word-for-word identical comments.
759.
by growse 6y ago
> I was phrasing that unclear, I meant that you have to trust Intel if you use Mobilecoin. Ah, fair. I think you could also argue that you have to trust Intel if you use Signal anyway. > Why wouldn't you be able to exercise that
760.
by growse 6y ago
> "Protecting the brand and controlling who connects to your service" is what put Moxie in a position of power from which cryptocurrency garbage could be introduced to scam money from its users. That's all there is to it.
761.
by growse 6y ago
> It's not just opposition to cryptocurrencies per se, the choice of Mobilecoin is also problematic[0]. On top of that you have to trust Intel. > [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26715348 No you don'
762.
by growse 6y ago
Not everyone agrees that protecting a brand and controlling who connects to and uses a service you run and pay for is "being an asshole". Lots of people pretty readily made the choice to move from WhatsApp to Signal when the benef
763.
by growse 6y ago
I was going to look at OpenWISP, which looks like it can centrally manage a whole bunch of kit, including openwrt and also edgeswitch devices.
764.
by growse 6y ago
> I don't think that's the case. Systemd was introduced with a SysV init backwards compatibility mode, so it was trivial to port services over to using it. Porting a systemd-only service over to SysV init is much harder, though
765.
by growse 6y ago
We were all "locked into" shell scripts for service management not so long ago. Either open source and software freedom affords us endless amounts of choice and capability to create, inspect, modify and use whatever software we li
766.
by growse 6y ago
I'm not sure how that's true in this case . I personally need the features of chrony, so despite running debian stable / systemd everywhere, I just turn systemd-timesyncd off. Tight coupling would be "you can't boo
767.
by growse 6y ago
> > But (serious question), why does it matter that systemd has an ntp daemon or that it subsumed udev? > What does a time system have to with system start infrastructure? If you want to write a time daemon, write a time daemon: th
768.
by growse 6y ago
Probably shouldn't have erased their SSH keys then.
769.
by growse 6y ago
> DNS cache poisoning, bit flips, and other such attacks. It does nothing for your site's confidentiality or availability, but it ensures the validity of the DNS records. Sure, but at what cost? It's hilariously easy to misconf
770.
by growse 6y ago
What threats does DNSSEC defend against? How does it change the "security" of a site I might visit?
771.
by growse 6y ago
Eh? The national law is literally written down. "Guesswork" doesn't seem like a good way to do anything without stumbling into a lot of confusion and miscommunication.
772.
by growse 6y ago
> You can have quite relaxed rules as long as everyone abides by the spirit of the agreement. As soon as one party violates that spirit you are forced to make everything much more explicit, which inflicts collateral damage on use cases n
773.
by growse 6y ago
> > Under the license another company couldn't setup a replacement. > I'm confused here -- the new 'open core' is available under the SSPL, which clearly allows this, as long as you provide the source code of an
774.
by growse 6y ago
How many people have a problem with the word 'main'?
775.
by growse 6y ago
What if the person who buys the art/NFT off the artist then sells the art to someone else but doesn't sell the NFT?
776.
by growse 6y ago
What if someone in a similar position to you sold a domain name they 'owned' to someone else off-blockchain? Where would the rights sit then?
777.
by growse 6y ago
And so when I sell my bicycle to someone (and write them a receipt) but forget to do the weird token transfer thing, who owns the bike? In the eyes of the law, the guy holding the bike and the receipt owns it. What the NFT says is irrelevan
778.
by growse 6y ago
So there's an angry person in my bar right now, shouting at everyone and driving away business. Who gets to decide that throwing them out is allowed or not?
779.
by growse 6y ago
So do you think I should be allowed to kick people out for being black, or that I should be forced to serve everyone no matter their actions?
780.
by growse 6y ago
> Delisting a book is not an expression. Do you think a bookshop should be free to choose to sell books written in German or not? If they have that freedom, what's that freedom called? > eBay is (should be) a neutral party There&

More ›