Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
grotorea
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
241.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
But do you need passwords? The way things are setup now you do, the password is the recovery mechanism. If the recovery mechanism was instead something like "photo of face next to government ID" then Google could stop using passw
242.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
If I understand it correctly it will avoid phishing, assuming people notice there's something up when they see a page asking for a traditional login for no good reason when they have passkeys. And it may be a transitionary step towards
243.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
For now at least, they saying you can still login with traditional methods as a backup even if using passkeys. Is it possible to control the credentials in your phone and copy them somewhere else?
244.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
> For proficient users who use passwords securely, this is an acute drop in security (if forced to use). Why? Because the user can have their device stolen and the PIN guessed? Can't you use a long password instead of a PIN if you w
245.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Someday, we will have brain reading technology to extract information from a newly dead brain, like we have to extract it from a RAM that was just turned off https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_boot_attack
246.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Yes, that's mostly it.
247.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
It at least avoids the user being phished or being compromised by reusing passwords. But it seems in this case the account recovery is just using the password so the passkey is mostly convenience and maybe Google trying to move things away
248.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
That does seem circular in Google's case, no? What cloud storage?
249.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
> What is the account recovery process if I’m locked out and don’t have my phone, say it’s lost or broken and I can’t verify my identity? > You can always fall back to legacy authentication options such as passwords and traditional 2-
250.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
A FAQ at the bottom answers some questions https://safety.google/authentication/passkey/ . Seems that the recovery if you lose the devices with stored passkeys is still using a password. And will it be possible to
251.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
I've seen that argument unkiddingly as "piracy is free advertising".
252.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
It could be possible that different movies could be popular with different groups. Say, imagine a hypothetical movie really popular with teenagers with Internet access but not enough money for tickets, compared with another movie that is
253.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Some people really just want to make Star Trek real. Or those artificial food pills from more dystopic scifi.
254.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
20000 being modest really says a lot about the state of security on the Internet.
255.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
So the email spam solution? Doesn't that come with its own list of problems? Also, stupid question from someone not that familiar with DDoS, can't you flood the target with requests even if the source address will be rejected? Or
256.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
But what class of customer doesn't riot when they try to maximise profits?
257.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
I'm not sure I follow. Aren't F2P games most misaligned with pricing per download since that means they end up with a bunch of negative value consumers and complete uncertainty whether they will end up with a positive or negative
258.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Not mentioned on the table I know https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/types edit: Oh you're right > Other models are very rare. For example, ILP64 (8/8/8: int, long, and pointer are
259.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
What economic devastation? Honest question I'm not sure what's the harm in civilian use of dynamite?
260.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Posthumous respectability perhaps. But as far as things go, I didn't like my leaked obituary so I decided to do something good is not pathetic IMHO.
261.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Isn't CS proper (not software engineering) much more a field of math? > I think the issue is not an objection to marketing but an objection to the inherently political nature of economics. The people who don't like the phrase N
262.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
A bit too far for me but it is unfair that economics gets one but the other fields neglected by Nobel don't.
263.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
I'm sure it feels intuitive when you have the answer but I am slightly surprised since women working in factories (and for lower wages) was a major issue at least from the 19th century.
264.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
In addition to what the other poster said, the actual monetary prize comes out of the inheritance of one the wealthiest persons of the day. The prizes that are fully under control of some scientist's organizations that could change th
265.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Are the science Nobel equivalents for Maths, CS, etc under very different rules from the Nobel?
266.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
I remember software that will stop me from using stuff like "password", how hard is it to grab a copy of any of those password leaks and ban any password found in there?
267.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
I do wonder how they expect to compete on the home PC market against Android and iOS devices with a subscription that is more expensive than the one time license. As for business, yeah they're probably going to bundle it on MS365 and d
268.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Eh, you can just get the price and include it in the budget as a monthly expense, no different from any other. Consider that the normal one time price will only last for as long as you use the OS. Why is a one time fee that will last an und
269.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
Windows is free because the price is bundled. There's the possibility that the PC will be cheaper with a subscription since the OEM won't have to pay Microsoft for the Windows license if it's the end user paying the subscript
270.
▲
by
grotorea
3y ago
The robustness principle applied to memory? Like when the browser adds the missing closing HTML tags instead of telling the dev to fix their code? We sure we want that?
More ›