groestl

6 ms·

31.
by groestl 7mo ago
> are so evenly matched It's because the real value of the models is in what we (humanity) fed them, and all of them have eaten the same thing for free.
32.
by groestl 7mo ago
Well, my business would be paying the trips, and everybody still refuses. So it's not the money.
33.
by groestl 7mo ago
Let's call it a valid UUIDv0 - all bits randomized including the version bits :)
34.
by groestl 8mo ago
Not sarcasm. Not cynism. Just pure humor.
35.
by groestl 8mo ago
I don't do any moral judgement at all, and I also don't predict the future. I respond to "You are not causing more water to be used by asking a human to work on something.", because that statement is false. (Mental) work
36.
by groestl 8mo ago
> You are not causing more water to be used by asking a human to work on something. That's certainly not true. Asking me to think hard about something will cause me to burn more calories. Asking me to do physical work even more so.
37.
by groestl 8mo ago
There are projects where long term addicts are given pure medical heroin (Diamorphin) in a controlled environment, and they do considerably better than their control group who does not receive their drugs like that. E.g. https://
38.
by groestl 8mo ago
100%. I don't want to know how the sausage was made. It's similar to research papers, or history books, where the way we arrive at results or outcomes in the real world is often quite different from the way it's presented in
39.
by groestl 8mo ago
And your data.
40.
by groestl 8mo ago
If you're self hosting your compiler on C, you are your own user.
41.
by groestl 8mo ago
Sounds like your daily interactions with Legal. Each time a different take.
42.
by groestl 8mo ago
I'd never share my pizza. A one pizza team, that's just me.
43.
by groestl 8mo ago
Maybe I'm missing something, or we do it differently here, but I think "spec" is defined to narrowly in that article. Start writing the first part of that document in that meeting, and everything ties together neatly.
44.
by groestl 8mo ago
I also discuss on a local newspaper forum as well, which is pretty popular, but the crowd here tends to be more insightful :)
45.
by groestl 8mo ago
We might be able to bring back some nuclear reactors, but building new one's: that's not on a feasible timeline.
46.
by groestl 9mo ago
Destructive operations are both tempting to some devs and immensely problematic in that industry for regulatory purposes, so picking a tech that is inherently incapable of destructive operations is alluring, I suppose.
47.
by groestl 9mo ago
My phone is always on silent mode. As is, AFAIK, the phone of all my friends.
48.
by groestl 9mo ago
On a meta level, seems this trajectory follows Alan Kay: first we made the complex things possible, now we make simple things simple.
49.
by groestl 10mo ago
Stockholm (SL Bus/Train via Märsta 47kr vs. Arlanda Express 340 SEK) Vienna (S-Bahn S7 4.40 EUR vs. City Airport Train 24.90 EUR) While with the Stockholm one, the public transport option is cheap but a little bit more complicated (the
50.
by groestl 10mo ago
From the top of my head I know three cities which have peculiarities when it comes to public transportation to the Airport. In two cases, it's obvious they do this to push the private train to foreigners, at 5x the ticket rate.
51.
by groestl 10mo ago
> I'm probably overthinking this one but the various lengths of the redaction bars would provide some information perhaps? You're definitely not overthinking this. Fitting words by length is the attack vector if the blanking it
52.
by groestl 10mo ago
> anyone can visually examine this. They can't, if the variations are subtle enough. For example, many people are oblivious to the fact that one can extract audio from objects captured on mute video, due to tiny vibrations. Analog i
53.
by groestl 10mo ago
> made their redactions with actual ink, and then re-scanned every page That's not very competent. > going analog is foolproof Absolutely not. There are many way's to f this up. Just the smallest variation in places that hav
54.
by groestl 10mo ago
Progressive tax on resource consumption, this is what a tax system for the next millennium looks like.
55.
by groestl 10mo ago
I guess it's the opposite of Futur III: https://www.der-postillon.com/2012/08/neue-zeitform-futur-ii...
56.
by groestl 10mo ago
I guess sarcasm.
57.
by groestl 10mo ago
Booked a trip yesterday, without knowing this has happened. ~1h off my usual trip time, which I got accustomed to in the last two decades. It's extremely awesome!
58.
by groestl 10mo ago
Not by a long shot.
59.
by groestl 10mo ago
>200
60.
by groestl 10mo ago
FWIW, we use Slack in that way, and it works.

More ›