Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
groestl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
38 ms
·
541.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
No offense, but this from a new account makes it look suspicious.
542.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
Thanks for the tool! Found a docu bug: the link in the "Grub" section does not point to the grub overlay :)
543.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> The problem of scrying into the unknowable People really need to accept that they can't and shouldn't have full introspection into everything they're ever interested in. Even if it's a thing they care about (like th
544.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
That's what I meant.
545.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
Fun fact, also "hard" in this title is a formally defined term.
546.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> But there was literally no hook for me to hold onto Ahm, from the text: "Boolean satisfiability, or SAT is a decision problem where an input is a boolean formula like [...]"
547.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
Hu? "total amount of tasks to do, or if we are going to finish the project on time" is exactly the boundary that should be upheld between contributors and their managers.
548.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
I (mostly) stopped documenting in prose and used ansible instead. It's a bit more work, but it paid off numerous times since then. The prose that's still left, because it's really really to cumbersome to implement, is left in
549.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
That's true, it was hard so set it up the first time and get all the details right. However, since then, my Arch Boxes have been an absolute breeze to work with (and my history includes Suse, Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, even LFS, ...)
550.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
Honestly, I could have packaged it myself, but it eroded my trust in the ecosystem. They seem to target a different use case. Which is fine by me, I just won't be in for the ride.
551.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
I found lxd very appealing in the beginning, but when they favoured snap as distribution channel, where, apparently, updates and restarts could only be blocked using the firewall [0], I moved away from it. And Ubuntu in general. [0] https:
552.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
And that's only the portion the businesses know about.
553.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
Because most people are so unbelievably boring, so statistically predictable and common, that taking off the edge of queries leads to higher click-through rates overall. It's the same pages all the time, and most people don't even
554.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> container orchestration layers are essentially glorified process supervisors. There is a little more to container orchestration runtimes. Would say at this time they are akin to a badly designed, distributed linker (I'm saying thi
555.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
This will never happen, I'm afraid :/
556.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
I generally agree with you, and I could probably have chosen a better word than "stupid" (not a native speaker though). That's why I tried to clarify in my last sentence, that "stupid" in this context means that the
557.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
We still arrive at concensus based on a (more or less free) market. Weights on this market are heavily skewed to the top, that's true. And as I said, democratic votes also don't exactly live up to the cultural standard that we at
558.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
Both posts are important here, IMHO. We have two signals to arrive at economic and productive decisions in our society, which favors distributed decisionmaking: democratic votes and price. There are all kinds of problems with the former, as
559.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> If text is all you need to produce personhood, why should we be limited to just one per lifetime? Maybe AI helps making this obvious to many people, but I think implicitly all of us know that we have, and are well versed in employing,
560.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
For me, this company was Network Solutions. Never have I ever dealt with a thing so bizzare. They even uppercased my email address when communicating with me.
561.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
"if we grant these systems too much power"
562.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> It doesn't have interests, thoughts and feelings. Why does it need these things to make the following statement true? > if we grant these systems too much power, they could do serious harm
563.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
You seriously underestimate what a process that's "generating new word combinations that look like the word combinations its already seen" can do, even when air-gapped (which ChatGPT isn't). Right now, at this moment, pe
564.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> The Go toolchain already calls home by default It's doing that to provide a functionality required by the user, which results in informed consent. If you do computing without a user's informed consent, you're building ma
565.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> useful for informing support decisions Useful does not equal ethical or legal. A lot of things would be useful to me.
566.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> Asking nicely doesn't work in pratice Well, to bad. Because if you don't, you've built a piece of malware, by definition. You need to ask, live with bias, and draw your conclusions accordingly.
567.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> The solution in these scenarios is to simply ask the user, with no default, whether they want telemetry to be enabled or disabled. And this is the way the Debian installer asks for participation in the Debian Popularity Contest. Which
568.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> Seems like we're at the alchemy stage again with all these blackbox AI models appearing everywhere. That would be the case if we had found a process that produces gold, but we would not have a way to explain it, right?
569.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> corporate personhood is little more than a legal shortcut or convenience at best. Kind of like inheritance vs. composition.
570.
▲
by
groestl
4y ago
> Exactly on curl's 25th birthday, we will ship curl 8.0.0. Funny, posted https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2013/03/23/why-no-curl-8/ here in a reply, only a couple of days ago - but I missed ther
More ›